[gentoo-dev] Re: About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions > point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that > solution? As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for desktop. There's nothing inherently "g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:09:03PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote: > > I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of > > bother to implement an "alternative" that doesn't actually gain anything > > over the traditional setup (plus ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Here is the documentation for their search command [1]. It would > probably be better for us to open a bug against bugzilla itself and > request those changes be put in the api. > I did some digging on Bugzilla's Bugzilla. There is already a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote: I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of bother to implement an "alternative" that doesn't actually gain anything over the traditional setup (plus making sure that partitions are mounted before udev starts.) At least in

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread Steven J Long
Zac Medico wrote: > On 04/09/2012 11:09 AM, Steven J Long wrote: >> One thing that has bothered me with the mooting of an initramfs as the >> new rescue system that rootfs has traditionally been, is at the we are >> told at the same time that the initramfs can be very minimal. If so, how >> does i

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:45:14PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of > > bugzilla. > > Cool, thank you for working on that. > > > I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations t

Re: [gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of > bugzilla. Cool, thank you for working on that. > I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do > anything about: > > - you can't search on cc: or keywords fields

Re: [gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 10-04-2012 a las 09:12 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that > > profiles. > > I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to > let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") w

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:51:33 Mike Frysinger wrote: > not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed > in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. I mean, no need to open a new bug, just continue in that security bug, because the fixed version has never had stable keyword. -- Ag

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything > > that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and > > mark it a blocker of 370

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo CJK team empty, or anyone knows about ibus?

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 02 April 2012 22:29:47 Naohiro Aota wrote: > Pacho Ramos writes: > >> > > Will CC cjk team then to let them know you are interested to join > >> > > (looks like there are four devs in cjk alias...) > > > > Any updates on this? > > I didn't notice him been working to return dev, I sent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are we allowed to provide valid SRC_URI for fetch restricted packages?

2012-04-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i don't see a problem here.  although this is something that you'd prob want > to post to the trustees and let them make a decision. > -mike > This is a bit of a stale thread. This particular package was modified to remove the SRC_URI, s

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: > there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything > that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and > mark it a blocker of 370409). > -mike I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 -- Agostino S

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are we allowed to provide valid SRC_URI for fetch restricted packages?

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 26 February 2012 06:34:13 Kacper Kowalik wrote: > I've been asked by a user to remove valid SRC_URI for a package that has > RESTRICT="fetch". The package in question requires you to go to > upstream's webpage, sign license agreement and then you're fed with > download link. User argues t

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.15 for unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
once glibc-2.14 starts stabilizing, i'll be moving 2.15 into unstable -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GSoC project

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
please don't top post, and stop sending html e-mail also, we have a GSoC list for this stuff. please see the site: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/userrel/soc/ -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:04:22PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > New udev and separate /usr partition > > > > Decide on whether a separate /usr is still a supported configuration. > > If it is, newer

[gentoo-dev] pybugz call for testers

2012-04-10 Thread William Hubbs
All, I have updated pybugz- to work with the xmlrpc interface of bugzilla. I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do anything about: - you can't add keywords to a bug with the post command, but you can with the modify command. - you can't search on cc: or key

Re: [gentoo-dev] About how to handle wxGTK based packages with gnome profiles

2012-04-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that > profiles. I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") would seem frustrating to me. With "wxwidgets" enabled by default people will ge