[gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:27:06 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > An initramfs which does this is created by >=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25 or > >=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be > sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr. We should really have some documentatio

[gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:53:25 -0500 as excerpted: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:27 PM, William Hubbs > wrote: >> here is the udev 181 unmasking news item. >> >> If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree  on 3/14 UTC. > > I guess this might be OK for unstable, but befo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 3/10/12 7:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: Well, I'm trying not to take sides in that war. Unless we want to patch the living daylights out of upsteam it seems almost moot. It is not a matter about siding. If our boot process requires glib or dbus we are sore idiots if we aren't either of them a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > I guess we could pour more effort in getting dracut more easy to use and/or > try to figure out which are the items that should be moved to / and fix the > remaining ones... > Well, I'm trying not to take sides in that war. Unless we want t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Dale
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:27 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> here is the udev 181 unmasking news item. >> >> If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree on 3/14 UTC. > > I guess this might be OK for unstable, but before this goes stable we > really need to improve the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 3/10/12 6:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: neither the genkernel nor dracut docs have specific instructions about I guess we could pour more effort in getting dracut more easy to use and/or try to figure out which are the items that should be moved to / and fix the remaining ones... lu

[gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:27 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > here is the udev 181 unmasking news item. > > If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree  on 3/14 UTC. I guess this might be OK for unstable, but before this goes stable we really need to improve the docs around this. As far as I

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: unmasking udev-181

2012-03-10 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is the udev 181 unmasking news item. If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree on 3/14 UTC. William Title: udev-181 unmasking Author: William Hubbs Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2012-03-14 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: =181, if you have /usr on

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-10 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/09/2012 11:20 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:49:44 -0500 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: isnt the whole point of the proposal to get eapi without sourcing ? so that we can use new bash features at local or global scope without risking that people with an ol

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds

2012-03-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:06:49 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote: > > HOMEPAGE         Package's homepage. If you are unable to locate an > > official one, try to provide a link to freshmeat.net or a similar > > package tracking site. Never refer to a variable name in the string; > > include only raw text. >