William Hubbs posted on Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:05:19 -0500 as excerpted:
> there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
>
> I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
> small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my
> origi
ll,
there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my
original announcement.
- news item release on 5/1
- stabilization on 5/8.
Willi
> > I'd take a different approach here; this code basically assumes that
> > the PM knows of it- note the chmod -s. The use flag protection you
> > tried adding, without some profile hacks, is user modifiable- meaning
> > users can flip it on even if the PM doesn't support it.
> >
> > Or consi
