On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:52:55 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 08:27 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following
> > functions
> > in EAPI <=2:
> > - python_version()
> > - python_mod_exists()
> > - pyth
On 03/02/2010 08:27 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following
> functions
> in EAPI <=2:
> - python_version()
> - python_mod_exists()
> - python_tkinter_exists()
> - distutils_python_version()
> - distutils_py
I propose a value that you can set at runtime. We do this at work
with the gflags package (already in the tree) or a config file.
-A
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/02/10 21:47, Alec Warner wrote:
>> I would recommend not hardcoding 10 seconds; but otherwise cac
On 03/02/2010 10:49 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> Why make the fixes when we can announce package-death on -dev and get
> the fixes for free from concerned users? :)
Exactly. :-)
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, malc wrote:
>> Markos,
>>
>> Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I
On 03/02/10 21:47, Alec Warner wrote:
> I would recommend not hardcoding 10 seconds; but otherwise caching is good ;)
What do you propose?
Sebastian
When am I getting control over that? Can infra help me?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
>> getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own
>> content would be great.
>
> The current page is said to generate
Why make the fixes when we can announce package-death on -dev and get
the fixes for free from concerned users? :)
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, malc wrote:
> Markos,
>
> Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the
> workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
>> getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own
>> content would be great.
>
> The current page is said to generate one XML request per bug listed on
> the page for each re
On 02/03/10 13:39, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
>
>>> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
>>> supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used.
>>>
>>>
>> I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword shou
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:31:39 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:29:00 malc wrote:
> > Markos,
> >
> > Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the
> > workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor
> > fixes, rather than simply mask/remove
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
>> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
>> supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used.
>>
> I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and
> more information can be provided elsewhere
On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own
> content would be great.
The current page is said to generate one XML request per bug listed on
the page for each request. From my experience trying to remove bugs
from that page yest
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:29:00 malc wrote:
> Markos,
>
> Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the
> workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor
> fixes, rather than simply mask/remove?
>
> Cheers,
> malc.
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Markos Ch
Markos,
Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the
workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor
fixes, rather than simply mask/remove?
Cheers,
malc.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> # Markos Chandras (02 Mar 2010)
> # Fails to bui
On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>
>
>> To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
>> - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE
>> - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED
>> - BUGDAY-REFUSED
>>
>
>> They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
> - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE
> - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED
> - BUGDAY-REFUSED
> They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled
> down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE".
This looks
On 03/02/10 02:32, Alec Warner wrote:
>> BUGDAY (nomination)
>> BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate)
>> NOBUGDAY(or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...)
>
> I think the last one is over-engineering a bit; bugzilla keywords are
> not permanent
How are they no
On 03/02/10 02:09, Duncan wrote:
> ... And here I'm proposing three:
>
> BUGDAY(nomination)
> BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate)
> NOBUGDAY (or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...)
>
> The latter would be for nominated bugs that were declined as
Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following
functions
in EAPI <=2:
- python_version()
- python_mod_exists()
- python_tkinter_exists()
- distutils_python_version()
- distutils_python_tkinter()
These functions are already banned in EAPI >=3.
1. In this week, t
# Markos Chandras (02 Mar 2010)
# Fails to build. Unmaintained. Bug #298143. It will be removed in
# 2010-05-02
net-misc/tipcutils
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
"Gilles Dartiguelongue (eva)" said:
> eva 10/03/01 23:31:32
>
> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
> Added:rhythmbox-0.12.7.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump. Lots of fixes, add rdepend for context panel plugin. Kill
> *.la files for plugins.
> (Portage ve
21 matches
Mail list logo