[gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2

2010-03-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:52:55 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 03/02/2010 08:27 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following > > functions > > in EAPI <=2: > > - python_version() > > - python_mod_exists() > > - pyth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2

2010-03-02 Thread Petteri Räty
On 03/02/2010 08:27 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following > functions > in EAPI <=2: > - python_version() > - python_mod_exists() > - python_tkinter_exists() > - distutils_python_version() > - distutils_py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Alec Warner
I propose a value that you can set at runtime. We do this at work with the gflags package (already in the tree) or a config file. -A On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/02/10 21:47, Alec Warner wrote: >> I would recommend not hardcoding 10 seconds; but otherwise cac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/02/2010 10:49 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > Why make the fixes when we can announce package-death on -dev and get > the fixes for free from concerned users? :) Exactly. :-) > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, malc wrote: >> Markos, >> >> Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/02/10 21:47, Alec Warner wrote: > I would recommend not hardcoding 10 seconds; but otherwise caching is good ;) What do you propose? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
When am I getting control over that? Can infra help me? On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: >> getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own >> content would be great. > > The current page is said to generate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread Alec Warner
Why make the fixes when we can announce package-death on -dev and get the fixes for free from concerned users? :) On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, malc wrote: > Markos, > > Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the > workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: >> getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own >> content would be great. > > The current page is said to generate one XML request per bug listed on > the page for each re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Nathan Zachary
On 02/03/10 13:39, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote: > >>> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for >>> supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. >>> >>> >> I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword shou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:31:39 Markos Chandras wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:29:00 malc wrote: > > Markos, > > > > Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the > > workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor > > fixes, rather than simply mask/remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote: >> This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for >> supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. >> > I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and > more information can be provided elsewhere

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/01/10 22:17, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > getting control of bugday.gentoo.org and be able to upload our own > content would be great. The current page is said to generate one XML request per bug listed on the page for each request. From my experience trying to remove bugs from that page yest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 21:29:00 malc wrote: > Markos, > > Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the > workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor > fixes, rather than simply mask/remove? > > Cheers, > malc. > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Markos Ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread malc
Markos, Provided trivial debug/fix on bug. I'm an ex-dev so I know the workload - but I'd love to see QA be looking to make these minor fixes, rather than simply mask/remove? Cheers, malc. On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > # Markos Chandras (02 Mar 2010) > # Fails to bui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Nathan Zachary
On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> > >> To make naming a bit more consistent, how about: >> - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE >> - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED >> - BUGDAY-REFUSED >> > >> They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > To make naming a bit more consistent, how about: > - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE > - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED > - BUGDAY-REFUSED > They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled > down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE". This looks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/02/10 02:32, Alec Warner wrote: >> BUGDAY (nomination) >> BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate) >> NOBUGDAY(or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...) > > I think the last one is over-engineering a bit; bugzilla keywords are > not permanent How are they no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-03-02 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/02/10 02:09, Duncan wrote: > ... And here I'm proposing three: > > BUGDAY(nomination) > BUGDAY-ACCEPTED (or whatever is thought appropriate) > NOBUGDAY (or BUGDAY-DECLINED, or BUGDAY-REFUSED, or...) > > The latter would be for nominated bugs that were declined as

[gentoo-dev] Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2

2010-03-02 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Members of Gentoo Python Project have agreed to deprecate the following functions in EAPI <=2: - python_version() - python_mod_exists() - python_tkinter_exists() - distutils_python_version() - distutils_python_tkinter() These functions are already banned in EAPI >=3. 1. In this week, t

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/tipcutils

2010-03-02 Thread Markos Chandras
# Markos Chandras (02 Mar 2010) # Fails to build. Unmaintained. Bug #298143. It will be removed in # 2010-05-02 net-misc/tipcutils -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/rhythmbox: metadata.xml ChangeLog rhythmbox-0.12.7.ebuild

2010-03-02 Thread Mark Loeser
"Gilles Dartiguelongue (eva)" said: > eva 10/03/01 23:31:32 > > Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog > Added:rhythmbox-0.12.7.ebuild > Log: > Version bump. Lots of fixes, add rdepend for context panel plugin. Kill > *.la files for plugins. > (Portage ve