[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-01-03 23h59 UTC

2010-01-03 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-01-03 23h59 UTC. Removals: www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin 2010-01-01 17:36:19 scarabeus kde-misc/bilbo 2010-01-02 18:15:02 ssuominen media-gfx/grender

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Major changes to gdesklets.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Joe Sapp
Thanks for looking at this Christian. On 12/29/2009 03:54 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Looks fine so far. What puzzled me is the documentation of the SLOT > variable. What is the motivation to do so? It would be possible for two different versions of a Control to be installed and work wit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:28:27AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Harald van Dijk wrote: > > >> > 65 base_src_util $@ > >> This is not problem > > > Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the > > result, which will not be split. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Harald van Dijk wrote: >> > 65 base_src_util $@ >> This is not problem > Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the > result, which will not be split. In general, $@ should be quoted, and it > would be a good idea to either do it he

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] base.eclass

2010-01-03 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 02:56:01AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 3.1.2010 01:56, Mark Bateman napsal(a): > > There seems to be alot of unquoted variables > > > > 65 base_src_util $@ > This is not problem Only because you can be sure there will be exactly one word in the result