On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:06:22PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
> > work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
>
> Wouldn't it be safer
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
> work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
Wouldn't it be safer to let this run on, say, Patrick's or Deigo's
tinderboxes for a day or so b
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:30 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
> > --- abiword-2.4.6.ebuild4 Jan 2009 22:51:26 - 1.15
> > +++ abiword-2.4.6.ebuild17 Dec 2009 10:54:05 - 1.16
> [...]
> > @@ -65,12 +65,12 @@
> >
> > src_install() {
> > do
Excerpts from Brian Harring's message of Fri Dec 18 20:16:19 + 2009:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:54:53PM +0700, Max Arnold wrote:
> > Initially my script has "/usr/bin/env python" shebang line. When I checked
> > actual installed
> > file, it contained "/usr/bin/python2.6". Who is responsib
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:54:53PM +0700, Max Arnold wrote:
> Initially my script has "/usr/bin/env python" shebang line. When I checked
> actual installed
> file, it contained "/usr/bin/python2.6". Who is responsible for this
> modification (eclass,
> distutils or something else)? Why not "/u
for various reasons/limitations/bugs/whatever, i rewrote epatch. seems to
work for me, but in case someone wants to check before i release:
epatch() {
_epatch_draw_line() {
# create a line of same length as input string
[[ -z $1 ]] && set "$(printf "%65s" ''
As promised, here is the slimmed down version of the Prefix quiz. As
requested, I'll post the answers on -core.
Prefix development quiz (Zero taste)
** when porting ebuilds for Gentoo Prefix, one will get confronted with
certain problems, these two questions hint at such problems **
4. Pack
