Sebastian,
I definitely admire your point and know that through your tracking and
Google
SoC project you have good visibility on this I do however have to disagree.
As much as I enjoy the open source community and admire the products they put
out I do believe Gentoo has the right appro
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is
> per package. I assume that DistroWatch is still one of the first places
> people go to get
Mike Frysinger wrote:
...
Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major
reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage.
We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage is at
2.1 currently. Tie it in and we have 2.2 (currently masked) nex
Hello there!
Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a
table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is
per package. I assume that DistroWatch is still one of the first places
people go to get a feeling for a Distro they heard about, besides
Wikpe
On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:42:45 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted:
> > On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping
Samuli Suominen (11 Sep 2009)
# No >= bluez 4 support wrt #279382 or update from upstream available.
# Masked for removal.
app-mobilephone/x70talk
# Samuli Suominen (11 Sep 2009)
# Doesn't compile with >= 2.6.25 kernel, or support >= bluez 4.
# Masked for removal. Bugs #244890 and #283735.
net-
