Re: [gentoo-dev] working on mysql-community 5.0.77 - mysql-extras

2009-02-27 Thread Gordon Malm
On Friday, February 27, 2009 15:12:04 Caleb Cushing wrote: > I went ahead and use the order you used previously all the patches > apply, but it still doesn't build. > > 86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DEMBEDDED_LIBRARY -DMYSQL_SERVER > -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr\"" -DDATADIR="\"/var/lib/mysql\"" > -DSHAR

Re: [gentoo-dev] truecrypt licensing - bug #241650

2009-02-27 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:34:12 +1100 Daniel Black wrote: > > I've run out of interest to chase down the answer to the range of issues here. > > Can someone with a few hours look trough all the info and see if truecrypt > license has improved to a situation where it is not putting the gentoo- > f

Re: [gentoo-dev] working on mysql-community 5.0.77 - mysql-extras

2009-02-27 Thread Caleb Cushing
I went ahead and use the order you used previously all the patches apply, but it still doesn't build. 86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DEMBEDDED_LIBRARY -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr\"" -DDATADIR="\"/var/lib/mysql\"" -DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/share/mysql\"" -I. -I../include -I../innobase/include -I.

[gentoo-dev] truecrypt licensing - bug #241650

2009-02-27 Thread Daniel Black
I've run out of interest to chase down the answer to the range of issues here. Can someone with a few hours look trough all the info and see if truecrypt license has improved to a situation where it is not putting the gentoo- foundation or gentoo user's at risk. If you could provide a fully cit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26

2009-02-27 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:40:26 +0100 Luca Barbato wrote: > >> Be specific. Explain how this works when, say, 0.34.4 is current, > >> you have a 0.34.5_live and 0.34.5 comes out. > > being live working as substitute for 0.34.5_preN (_live) component > the appearance of 0.34.5 will be higher than tho

Re: [gentoo-dev] working on mysql-community 5.0.77 - mysql-extras

2009-02-27 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Yes. There is a well defined order, you can get it from their SRPM > specfile. Also check to see which patches it deliberately DOESN'T apply. > Percona 5.0.75-b12 skipped the binlog-mirroring patch EG. http://www.percona.com/mysql/5.0.77-

[gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass -- review

2009-02-27 Thread Torsten Veller
Please review the attached perl-module.eclass. Patch linked below. Changes (#239510): ~~~ - EAPI 2 support - default license - reduced EXPORT_FUNCTIONS for EAPI=2 - HOMEPAGE changed - LDFLAGS support - quoting - removes updatepod() - removes .packlist files - removes empty *.bs files - removed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-02-27 Thread Rémi Cardona
My 2¢ : Keep the EAPI inside the ebuild itself. On the first line, on the fifth line, as an argument with the shebang, as a comment, as a variable, as a function call, ... I really don't care what it looks like, as long as it's inside the ebuild. Cheers, Rémi

Re: [gentoo-dev] working on mysql-community 5.0.77 - mysql-extras

2009-02-27 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:48:14AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > There were security changes in MySQL that caused the patches to not work > > quite right anymore. Percona has updated patches, I just haven't got to > > them yet, work is m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-02-27 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > My notes so far: > > 1) Status quo >  - does not allow changing inherit >  - bash version in global scope >  - global scope in general is quite locked down > > 2) EAPI in file extension >  - Allows changing global scope and the internal format

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ?

2009-02-27 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 27/02/2009 06:32, Jeremy Olexa a écrit : bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc? I would say it is in fact a license, but since all it seems to do is to confirm that whatever GnuGk does under the GPLv2 is allowed, I wouldn't necessarily put it in the license dir. But do i