On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:18:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:33 -0500
> Michael Sterrett wrote:
> > So everybody who emerges gnupg since this change is wasting space
> > for no good reason.
>
> If you care about a couple of hundred kilobytes, relying upon
> individual e
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:33 -0500
Michael Sterrett wrote:
> So everybody who emerges gnupg since this change is wasting space for
> no good reason.
If you care about a couple of hundred kilobytes, relying upon
individual ebuilds to ask the package manager to compress documentation
in some arbitr
Why would people want to blindly remove prepalldocs when it clearly
results in an inferior build of the package?
Take the recent change to the (already marked stable)
gnupg-2.0.9.ebuild as an example:
Before:
$ epm -qi gnupg | grep Size
Size: 2845754
$ epm -qi gnupg | grep Size
Size
Thomas Anderson said:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a note that in the council meeting on 02/12/2009 the
> function 'prepalldocs' is banned for use in ebuilds with EAPIs 0 1
> and 2. If you want some functionality from this function, please
> propose a new function or clearly defined
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:27:24 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> This is not a fault of bash-completion but rather the eselect
> bash-completion module itself. Since our eselect team is defunct, I
> will mask the bash-completion USE flag for app-admin/eselect unless
> someone steps up to take care of it (
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 11:55 Tue 17 Feb , Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> We should only be using eselect now to enable bash-completion. I think
>> bash-completion-config is broken now anyway
>> (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253878). So, after this
>> ch
On 11:55 Tue 17 Feb , Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> We should only be using eselect now to enable bash-completion. I think
> bash-completion-config is broken now anyway
> (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253878). So, after this
> change, I will p.mask b-c-c for removal.
>
> Any concerns? The u
Hello,
I would like to request that bash-completion-20081218 to be marked
stable by the arches soon here.
In doing so, I'm going to make the following change to bash-completion.eclass:
-RDEPEND="bash-completion?
- ( || (
- app-admin/eselect
-
