[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:06:45 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been > abandoned? > > (I'm wondering whether it's worth th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Magnus Granberg
On Sunday 11 January 2009 04.26.00 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other > > > distros are now carrying: > > > - the -Wfo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:03:17 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other > > distros are now carrying: > > - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default > > - the -D_FORTIFY_SOUR

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Magnus Granberg
On Sunday 11 January 2009 01.06.45 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600 > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P > > Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been > abandoned? > > (I'm wondering whether it's worth the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2009-01-10 Thread Friedrich Oslage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb: > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > mask sys-apps/baselayout-vserver for removal > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.9378 profiles/package.mask > > file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been abandoned? (I'm wondering whether it's worth the pain of dealing with 4.1's lack of tr1 regex support...) -- Ciaran McCre

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other > distros are now carrying: > - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default > - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default > > if you dont want this stu

[gentoo-dev] gcc 4.3.2 security updates

2009-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other distros are now carrying: - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default if you dont want this stuff, you can use the flag -Wno-format-security and the flag -U_FORTIFY