Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilize ebuilds which use EAPIs only supported by ~arch PMs

2008-10-14 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marius Mauch kirjoitti: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200 >> Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Ri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilize ebuilds which use EAPIs only supported by ~arch PMs

2008-10-14 Thread Petteri Räty
Marius Mauch kirjoitti: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200 > Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote: There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilize ebuilds which use EAPIs only supported by ~arch PMs

2008-10-14 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200 Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > > > > There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one > > > presented coul

Re: [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND?

2008-10-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 13/10/2008 в 14:34 -0500, Jeremy Olexa пишет: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some packages, > > because they could be > > removed? If yes, which ones? Or should we leave the system

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update

2008-10-14 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
> --- gentoo-x86/eclass/fox.eclass 2008-10-12 14:31:36.0 +0200 > +++ fox-proposed.eclass 2008-10-13 20:27:05.0 +0200 > [...] > -inherit eutils libtool versionator > > +inherit autotools eutils libtool versionator You should probably be setting WANT_AUTO* before inheriti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilize ebuilds which use EAPIs only supported by ~arch PMs

2008-10-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > > There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one presented > > could be. Any decent solution for this case? > > There are only a few obvious ones, you'll ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-14 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:59 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 13-10-2008 15:27:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:01 +0100 > > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unless someone can say what using PROPERTIES=prefix would break, I'd > > > go with that. It's a /cl