-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Apparently, setting USE=x86 in make.conf on amd64 arch can have funny
> consequences such as [1]. And I can imagine even more subtle and hard to
> detect errors due to this.
>
> I think it's better to prevent this rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it's better to prevent this rather than waste time with bug
>> reports like that. I asked Zac on IRC whether portage could filter such
>> f
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 10:41:07 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
By the way, I'm against this stuff. I rather see a PATH solution
involved. Portage already has a DEFAULT_PATH, and if someone refuses to
install patch, one could always use a special directory with symlinks to
the g-v
On 17-09-2008 10:41:07 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>> By the way, I'm against this stuff. I rather see a PATH solution
>> involved. Portage already has a DEFAULT_PATH, and if someone refuses to
>> install patch, one could always use a special directory with symlinks to
>> the g-versions, e.g. pa
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 10:21:17 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in work so
modifications like what you suggest
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, "C. Bergström"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
sooner.. Instead of any system change
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 17-09-2008 09:59:42 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in
work so modifications like what you suggest w
On 17-09-2008 10:21:17 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> >> Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
> >> See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
> >>
> >
> > I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in work so
> > modifications like what you suggest wouldn't be
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, "C. Bergström"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
>>> sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Ins
On 17-09-2008 09:59:42 +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>> Why not simply alias patch=gpatch in profile.bashrc?
>> See the FreeBSD profile for an example.
>>
> I'd like to package portage for OpenSolaris and have it just drop-in
> work so modifications like what you suggest wouldn't be required.
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Inside
the eutils.eclass do a quick check for gpatch and if it exists use
that vs patch.
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, C. Bergström wrote:
> Here's another idea and I don't know why I didn't think of it
> sooner.. Instead of any system change to the patch ebuild.. Inside
> the eutils.eclass do a quick check for gpatch and if it exists use
> that vs patch.
Why not simply alias patch=gpat
12 matches
Mail list logo
