On 15-09-2008 13:20:23 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > For future EAPIs, ARCH could be a regular USE_EXPANDed flag as you
> > suggest, and package managers could filter any flag in USE which is
> > not listed in IUSE.
>
> While I don't necessarily disagree with you, my impression is that
> most peopl
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:01:46 +0200
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While I don't necessarily disagree with you, my impression is that
> > most people tend to think that certain profile-specific flags such
> > as userland_* and kernel_* should be considered as implicit members
> > of I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can you add it to #gentoo-tr. seqizz is the channel founder.
Thanks.
Robin H. Johnson yazmış:
| Hi folks,
|
| Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
| replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
|
Bouncer.gentoo.org will be offline for an 30-60 minutes this evening, to
migrate between hosts and database servers as part of OSL's database
upgrades.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 348
For those asking about Bugzilla3 for Gentoo, it's a work-in-progress for
the test version. Hopefully I'll announce testing access in the next
week or two.
On a side note, upstream Bugzilla was doing a survey on large Bugzilla
installs, and contacted me to get the Gentoo perspective. The results
ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it's better to prevent this rather than waste time with bug
>> reports like that. I asked Zac on IRC whether portage could filter such
>> f
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's better to prevent this rather than waste time with bug
> reports like that. I asked Zac on IRC whether portage could filter such
> flags. He suggested using use.mask in profiles. Well since ARCH is also
> s
Apparently, setting USE=x86 in make.conf on amd64 arch can have funny
consequences such as [1]. And I can imagine even more subtle and hard to
detect errors due to this.
I think it's better to prevent this rather than waste time with bug
reports like that. I asked Zac on IRC whether portage could
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Michael Hammer wrote:
>> But for me it's still questionable why we don't have a gentoo project
>> for this important task?
>
> You mean something like http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml ?
>
> Cheers,
> -jkt
>
This page is incomplete and needs some more details added to i
