On P, 2008-07-27 at 18:20 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a):
> > On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > > Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of
> > > course it's kinda difficult
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-07-27 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo 2008-07-22 07:55:25 graaff
games-arcade/sdlpong2008-07-22 20:11:58 mr_bones_
media-plugins/g
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> [...]
The QA check which verifies that LDFLAGS are respected is now in Portage
trunk and will be released in 2.2_rc4.
Nice work. Thank you :)
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:45:29 -0500
Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are
> > already available.
>
> So, if bugs are being fixed why is there a need to fix something that
> isn't b
2008-07-27 05:45:29 Jeremy Olexa napisał(a):
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are already
> > available.
>
> So, if bugs are being fixed
Not all of them.
> Are bugs being ignored or RESOLVED, WONTFIX?
These bugs which
2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a):
> On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of
> > course it's kinda difficult to always check if a package honors it or
> > not. But it's a good idea to file a
