Hi,
packages that are in a herd, but could need someone dedicated to it:
app-portage/elogv, elogviewer, kelogviewer (tools-portage) -- low
maintenance
dev-lang/erlang (lang-misc) -- a version bump now and then (four
times a year), seldomly but then obscure bugs, cooperative upstream
mail-
On 16:34 Sat 19 Jul , Josh Saddler wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
>> developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for
>> software developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and
>> not intend
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this
>> profile without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea.
>
> This isn't enough?
>
> %% grep KNOW *
> make.defaults:I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING="yes"
>
> ;)
>
>
Nobody ever re
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this profile
without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea.
This isn't enough?
%% grep KNOW *
make.defaults:I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING="yes"
;)
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the "Developer" installation pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:39:04 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
> developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
> developers and don't see
Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using
developer profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software
developers and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not
intended for end users. They know the "Developer" installation profiles
of other distros a
Well, it looks like we're not alone on this project. This email was just sent
to me:
Adam,
I managed to track down someone who can probably help you with your ICC work,
if you're nice to him. :)
See the forwarded message:
Have your friend contact bill dot hilliard at intel dot com. He's on t
Cold you please fix your reply?
--
Michael Hammer|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Graz, AT
Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at
pgpDY8QTPhvzj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Duncan wrote:
Has anyone done a study of -Os vs -O2 with gcc-4.3.x,
Just a quick note while on the subject : -Os is known to break some
packages.
Although it has been a while since I've last had a full -Os system,
there was a time when -Os was a _very_bad_idea_. That's why the Gnome
Herd (
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:55:00 +
"Raul Porcel (armin76)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
armin76 08/07/18 17:55:00
Modified: mozcoreconf-2.eclass
Log:
Enable by default mozilla's optimization
+IUSE="${IUSE} custom-optimization"
+
Could you use custom-cf
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:34:53 -0400:
> Personally, I use -Os across the board when it doesn't break. As you
> said I tend to be memory/IO bound, and optimizing for size helps with
> both (swapping causes IO). I'd prob
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Bridge wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
>> > '@system' during updates
13 matches
Mail list logo
