[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2008/2009 Nominations end TODAY 23:59 UTC

2008-06-17 Thread Łukasz Damentko
Hi guys, This is your final reminder. The nominations process for Gentoo Council 2008/2009 ends today 23:59 UTC and it ends for good. If there's still somebody you would like to nominate or if you haven't accepted (or declined) your nomination yet, please do so on the gentoo-dev mailing list TOD

[gentoo-dev] Re: Shiny new stuff

2008-06-17 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd really appreciate a few pointers at your pet projects, shiny new > things and even half-baked ideas that are far from being usable. Just > show us what is out there waiting to be polished, packaged and used > by legions of happy users! Gentoo Arch Te

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP56] USE flag descriptions in metadata

2008-06-17 Thread Petteri Räty
Doug Goldstein kirjoitti: All, Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary "tools" to document their USE flag usage it better detail on a per p

[gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Re-Defining team and herd

2008-06-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 17-06-2008 09:54:46 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: >> From the GLEP: >> *snip* >> The biggest differences to the current system are: >> * A team is not implicitly defined as the people who maintain the >> packages in a certain herd >> * A herd is really only a logical unit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-17 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:59:37 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About glep-54: > > emerge code-scm > > what should fetch? > > (given that code is an editor and code-scm is a plugin adding scm > support...) code-scm. There is no way of distinguishing between a c/p and a c/p-v, whic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-17 Thread Luca Barbato
Ryan Hill wrote: On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:16:36 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bernd Steinhauser wrote: Wow, impressive. Actually, you can't be serious... I am. GLEP 54 for quite some time now and it works very well. adds nothing to - and sets usage as is. I just don't se

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Re-Defining team and herd

2008-06-17 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 17-06-2008 09:54:46 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > From the GLEP: > *snip* > The biggest differences to the current system are: > * A team is not implicitly defined as the people who maintain the packages > in a certain herd > * A herd is really only a logical unit of packages and may therefore

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Re-Defining team and herd

2008-06-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
And yet another GLEP. This time it's about our herd and team structure: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-team.html http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-team.txt >From the GLEP: *snip* The biggest differences to the current system are: * A team is not implicitly defined as the p

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP] GLEP Purpose and Guidelines

2008-06-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi there Since GLEP 1 is outdated (it still mentions project managers, etc.) and I think that current GLEP workflow is too undefined and not well suited for changing organizational policies I wrote a new one: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-glep.html http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council nominations deadline

2008-06-17 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 23:04 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > Just for completenessess sake, i was nominated and declined. No one > likes my idea of teaming up with McDonalds to create the McGentoo meal > (each includes a free collectible developer bobblehead and > maintainer-needed bug). > Depends on th