Re: [gentoo-dev] xmpp vs. jabber USE flag

2008-04-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 12 April 2008, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > A user recently filled bug #216300 > (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216300) which is about changing > > jabber USE flag to xmpp. Here is user's comment: > > Is it another reason than legacy reasons that named the USE-flag > > "jabb

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4.2 / gcc-4.3 plans

2008-04-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 11 April 2008, Vaeth wrote: > > So the point is, our current 2.6.24 kernel is safe. > > I can *not* confirm this. Just some days ago, I compiled > hardened-sources-2.6.24 (which uses genpatches-2.6.24-5; > current gentoo-sources uses genpatches-2.6.24-6, but the > difference is obviously

[gentoo-dev] xmpp vs. jabber USE flag

2008-04-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hello list, A user recently filled bug #216300 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216300) which is about changing jabber USE flag to xmpp. Here is user's comment: > > Is it another reason than legacy reasons that named the USE-flag "jabber"? > Since 2007 XMPP has been the name of the stand

[gentoo-dev] masking app-admin/gnome-system-tools-2.14

2008-04-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hello list, 12 Apr 2008; Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> package.mask: Masking gnome-system-tools because it is broken, to help fix it, see bug #214265. --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-12 15:19 --- ok guys, here is the situation. We need someone really

[gentoo-dev] [last rite] dev-libs/libsigcx

2008-04-12 Thread Rémi Cardona
# Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (12 Apr 2008) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Still builds but # nothing in the tree deps on it, upstream dead # See bug #191855 dev-libs/libsigcx We don't actually know of _any_ upstream project using that library... Cheers, Rémi -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.o