[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-ruby/rubygems: ChangeLog rubygems-1.1.0-r0.ebuild

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What was the purpose of bumping this to an -r0? I didn't see any > previous rubygems ebuilds doing this. As I said to _Mr_Bones and ferringb, I was just absentminded when renaming it from a later revision in my overlay

Re: User patches (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild)

On 2008/03/31, Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that maybe we should first introduce new patching phase and > then make this user patch really usable feature. For example if you > want to patch something that's input to running autotools, doing it > in post_src_unpack is too la

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild

Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:15:45 +0400: > It possible to use /etc/portage/bashrc to have this infrastructure. > Search mailing list, it was discussed here at least twice, and this is > example from solar: > > http://dev.gent

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-editors/leafpad: ChangeLog leafpad-0.8.14.ebuild

Hi, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Seeing as this is an editor and a "GTK+ based simple text editor" I > > doubt it has much claim to emacs-ness. > > why does this matter ? if an application includes optional support > for an "emacs skin" such that it includes emacs > bindings/shortcuts

Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:40:42 +0200 Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > > 'fixed' via specification next time... > > maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are > failing me, but i find the above

User patches (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild)

Mark Loeser wrote: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote: Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to apply a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it themselves (presumably if they want to patch somethin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-editors/leafpad: ChangeLog leafpad-0.8.14.ebuild

On Monday 31 March 2008, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > | On Sunday 30 March 2008, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > |>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote: > |>>> > |>>> And IMHO the "emacs" USE flag should not be used here: > |>>> > |>>> $ ./configure -hs > |>>> Configu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild

В Пнд, 31/03/2008 в 06:21 +, Duncan пишет: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar > 2008 20:39:14 -0400: > > > there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely > > doable from a user perspective, just having it

[gentoo-dev] [7-day last rite] app-misc/pastemecli

The package app-misc/pastemecli is a pastebin client for pasteme.com, which no longer exists. Bug 213754 Will be removed in 7 days -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)

On 31/03/2008, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anders Ossowicki wrote: > > On 31/03/2008, *Thilo Bangert* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > > > 'fixed' via specification next

Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)

Anders Ossowicki wrote: On 31/03/2008, *Thilo Bangert* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > 'fixed' via specification next time... maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities

Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)

On 31/03/2008, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > > 'fixed' via specification next time... > > maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are > failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offen

OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)

> Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs > 'fixed' via specification next time... maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offensive. am i too thin skinned for gentoo-dev? signature.asc Desc