Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage

2008-03-20 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Christian Faulhammer wrote: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Petteri Räty wrote: Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti: in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from CVS to Bazaar and thus we need th

[gentoo-dev] webmin maintainership

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Dibb
I've taken over maintainership of webmin, usermin, and already assigned the bugs to me. Thanks to armin76 for recent security bumps. That's all. Steve -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ryan Hill
Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We seriously need a PM-independent way of saying "run the testsuite", "run the testsuite with user privledges", and "run the testsuite with root privledges if you can, otherwise forget it". Also requi

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: > That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the > transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated > baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns, suggestions > and comments can and should be routed t

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/3/20, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Roy Marples wrote: > > On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: > > > >> I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if > >> we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration > >> will be, we

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Doug Goldstein
Roy Marples wrote: On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration will be, we'll definitely need a howto. Fun, fun. I already provide do

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] net-libs/xulrunner-1.9 slotting or not?

2008-03-20 Thread Raúl Porcel
FYI this will be finally slotted. Turns out it couldn't be slotted because a patch we used that simulated xulrunner-1.8 pkgconfig files. But since 99% of the stuff that depends on xulrunner-1.8 won't work with xulrunner-1.9, those packages should be fixed by upstream, and they should look for t

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: > I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if > we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration > will be, we'll definitely need a howto. Fun, fun. I already provide documentation with commands

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: New build types

2008-03-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Steve Long kirjoitti: I don't see how it would wreak more havoc than a novice using, eg ANT from Java which s/he is comfortable with, and then further having to learn BASH peculiarities when things don't fit with the eclass. But yeah, the fun is what attracts me to the idea more than anything.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Major changes to the Gnome2 Eclasses

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Long
Rémi Cardona wrote: > Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way > to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a > pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass > somewhere) I'd really appreciate it, as I really don't want to re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:52:40 +0100 Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if has userpriv ${FEATURES} && ! has usersandbox ${FEATURES};then > make check-local || die "test suite failed" > else > ewarn "Activate FEATURES=userpriv and deactivate \ > FEATURES=users

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * 174335: Some ebuild use FEATURES. Can we get them to stop doing > > > that, or do we have to force package managers to emulate it? > > > > We seriously need a PM-independe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * 174335: Some ebuild use FEATURES. Can we get them to stop doing > > that, or do we have to force package managers to emulate it? > > We seriously need a PM-independent way of saying "run the testsuite", > "run the testsu

[gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage

2008-03-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Petteri Räty wrote: > > Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti: > >> in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects > >> overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from > >> CVS to Bazaar and thus we need the new eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: New build types

2008-03-20 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:51:13AM +, Steve Long wrote: > Rémi Cardona wrote: > > > Steve Long a écrit : > >> First and foremost to give an environment wherein people can write their > >> installation scripts using the language they are most comfortable with. > > > > If bash is not "easy" or