On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:34 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> This is not a support channel and that, while an interesting picture,
> provides absolutely no information whatsoever.
>
Indeed. Please try [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include some useful
background information.
Matthias
signature.asc
Desc
This is not a support channel and that, while an interesting picture,
provides absolutely no information whatsoever.
Please don't post to the gentoo-dev ml.
Alistair.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
PMS currently has the following:
> The package manager must not impose fixed limits upon the number of
> version components. No integer part of a version specification may
> contain more than eight digits. Package managers should indicate or
> reject any version that is invalid according to these
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:49 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For hpux fex this just is adding some symlinks:
> /sbin/init.d/name -> /my/prefix/sbin/init.d/distccd
> /sbin/rc3.d/S990name -> /sbin/init.d/name # to start in runlevel 3
> /sbin/rc2.d/K100name -> /sbin/init.d
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:53:20 +0100, Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 03-03-2008 13:36:25 +, Roy Marples wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:22:13 Roy Marples wrote:
>> > So the only thing left (aside from bug fixing) is to instruct OpenRC
>> > dependency
>> > code that it'
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:53 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 03-03-2008 13:36:25 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:22:13 Roy Marples wrote:
> > > So the only thing left (aside from bug fixing) is to instruct OpenRC
> > > dependency
> > > code that it's in a prefix and t
On 03-03-2008 13:36:25 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:22:13 Roy Marples wrote:
> > So the only thing left (aside from bug fixing) is to instruct OpenRC
> > dependency
> > code that it's in a prefix and to respect the noprefix keyword in services,
> > or
> > to provide d
On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:22:13 Roy Marples wrote:
> So the only thing left (aside from bug fixing) is to instruct OpenRC
> dependency
> code that it's in a prefix and to respect the noprefix keyword in services,
> or
> to provide dummy services.
This is now done.
I have OpenRC fully workin
Sunday, 2. March 2008, Richard Freeman Ви написали:
> George Shapovalov wrote:
> > The good thing about this approach is that it only requires an initial
> > investment of organizing and automating things but does not add any
> > regular work to the devs. In fact, if the "tested" category becomes
>
