Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2008 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:21:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:
> To restate it more clearly from your paragraph above:
> kmail DEPENDS on gpgme built-with gnupg-2
> psiDEPENDS on gpgme built-with gnupg-1
> basket DEPENDS on gpgme bui
Again...
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/local/layman/openrc/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-.ebuild
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 3666
!!! Expected: 3629
On 1/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for adding digest, but:
>
> Calculating de
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List
>
> 2008 is here and it's time for some change!
>
> OpenRC is now ready for testing. There are no ebuilds in the tree, but
> some are available here [1] that offers a baselayout-2 shell that
> pulls in openrc-999
On Tuesday 01 of January 2008 06:30:01 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I would like council to discuss GLEP 54 and 55.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Ja
As per bug #204110, it is a good idea to make 'ocamlopt' support an
useflag. I've started converting a few packages to not strictly require
it. So far I'm at 8 local useflags. I'm planning to make it global very
soon.
ocamlopt - Enable ocamlopt support (ocaml native code compiler) --
Produces fa
While you're at it, I think almost everything in desc/video_cards.desc,
desc/input_devices.desc, and a few more, could use some attention.
In particular, things like nv vs. nvidia are quite confusing. I usually
end up reading the xorg-server ebuild when I want to makes sense of it,
which defeats t
Markus Ullmann wrote:
>> -junit - Adds junit awareness -- useful for developers.
>> +junit - Adds junit testframework awareness -- useful for developers
>
> junit - Adds junit test framework awareness -- useful for developers
Actually, this flag should probably go away with gen-1 java ebuilds
(ge
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:52 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 1:41 PM, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd appreciate a lot of testing, and just email this thread or me saying
> > that it works or there's a bug. Hopefully we can get this into portage
> > soonish.
> gcc:
Santiago M. Mola schrieb:
> -ffmpeg - Enable ffmpeg support
> +ffmpeg - Enable ffmpeg support --FIXME
ffmpeg - Enable ffmpeg-based audio/video codec support
> -junit - Adds junit awareness -- useful for developers.
> +junit - Adds junit testframework awareness -- useful for developers
junit - Ad
On Jan 1, 2008 1:41 PM, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate a lot of testing, and just email this thread or me saying
> that it works or there's a bug. Hopefully we can get this into portage
> soonish.
>
It's badly broken on my system (Gentoo Linux amd64). Compilation fails
w
On Wednesday 02 of January 2008 16:58:33 Mark Loeser wrote:
> Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > You're the one forcing people to remove overriding USE flags from
> > use.local.desc when that's something that people have been doing for
> > ages. The current Portage tools support that method.
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You're the one forcing people to remove overriding USE flags from
> use.local.desc when that's something that people have been doing for
> ages. The current Portage tools support that method.
Because this behaviour is not documented anywhere, and if you check
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:43 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> gpgme is completely unable to support both versions at the same time.
> It takes the path to GnuPG when the libray is compiled, and defaults to
> /usr/bin/gpg.
It's a stupid mess since from what I can tell, gnupg and gpgme has the
sam
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:15 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/2/08, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Those functions were removed from functions.sh as only update-modules
> > still uses them. udev does use KV_to_int though. I don't really want to
> > add those functions back. Although we
On 1/2/08, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those functions were removed from functions.sh as only update-modules
> still uses them. udev does use KV_to_int though. I don't really want to
> add those functions back. Although we could trivially add is_older_than
> as a C applet built into rc
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 16:39 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/1/08, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
> > > useful :).
> >
> > It also means all config files, with the exceptions of fstab and rc.conf
> > are in conf.d
Hi,
masking out the dependency with /etc/portage/profile is not a problem, but why is it
needed? Why is there the dependency on man-pages in diffutils? I think this question is
not related to embedded, it's about a wrong dependency of a system-package. More people
could hit this when they buil
On 1/1/08, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It took me some time to find /etc/conf.d/modules, but it's certainly
> > useful :).
>
> It also means all config files, with the exceptions of fstab and rc.conf
> are in conf.d and not some random dir :)
Took me a while too... Some ChangeLog do
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> One of the GLEP's primary goals is to provide a global use flag
>> definition and over-ride
>> it with a local definition. How does putting all flags in use.desc
>> and over-riding local flags in
>> use.local.desc not accomplish th
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Santiago M Mola wrote:
> A lot of people have complaints about the quality of USE flag
> descriptions, so let's see if we can improve them a bit.
> [...]
> -emacs - Adds support for GNU Emacs
> +emacs - Adds support for GNU Emacs text editor
Please leave this one as it
Hi,
A lot of people have complaints about the quality of USE flag
descriptions, so let's see if we can improve them a bit.
This a list of some descriptions which could be improved. Some are
just stupid things like trailing dot (not a bad thing, but most of
them doesn't have one) and some others a
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 01
Jan 2008 06:09:28 +0100:
> Most of the time when I see complaints about the description of USE
> flags (I'm fully aware of those) the issue isn't the format, just that
> noone else has come up with a better des
22 matches
Mail list logo
