On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see what's wrong with EAPI (if set, otherwise implicitly whatever
> the ebuild sets, or 0 if not set there) only applying to the file it's
> declared in.
Because that doesn't work at all, see
http://article.gmane.
On Dec 27, 2007 11:40 PM, Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... EAPI is stuff PM supports/exports to the ebuild ...]
> Logical and proper to me.
Actually, when I'm asked what EAPI is, I just say "EAPI is a standard
definition for the ebuild structure, implying supporting features from
the pac
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> branding: Enable Gentoo specific branding
>> [questionable, as used for splashes/shortcuts/artwork]
>
> Well, my personal opinion here is that we should enable this by default
> on *at least* the desktop profiles, as providing sensible defaults and
> branding isn't outs
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > c) It's an extremely bizarre restriction, the likes of which do not
>> > currently exist, that will confuse the hell out of all the people
>> > that don't realise that such a restriction exists.
>>
I don't think it's that hard to understand "You can only set EAPI *once*
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:52:53 +
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:03:12 +
>> > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> * Set the EAPI inside the ebuild in a way that makes it easy to
>> >> fetch it This
No on logrotate per several previous conversations.
The majority of the ones listed are not globally relevent which is the
first criteria for creating a new global use flag.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Excerpts from René 'Necoro' Neumann's message of Fri Nov 09 00:28:47 +0100 2007:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Long schrieb:
> > René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> >> cmake-utils_src_enable python => -DENABLE_python=...
> >>
> >> Wanted would be that it returned -DENABLE_
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
After a long and bumpy ride, concluded by a very BOFH-esque "LDAP
replication failure, we're on it" (thanks Robin, by the way), it's my
pleasure to announce that Richard Freeman (rich0) is a new Gentoo
developer. Richard has been an amd64 AT for some time already, and so
wil
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:10:13 +0100
>> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ok, that seems a fine definition of what an eapi is. Everybody agrees on it?
>>>
>> Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager h
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:10:13 +0100
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, that seems a fine definition of what an eapi is. Everybody agrees on it?
>
> Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager has to export
> to an ebuild/eclass. That includ
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:58:39 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:57:12 +0100
> Markus Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > server12
>
> See previous discussions on why this can't be global (essentially, it
> has different meanings for
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:28:41 +0100
Michael Haubenwallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This also could be done as (using 'ebuild' instead of 'emerge')
>
> #! /usr/bin/env ebuild.1
>
> and PM could provide some 'ebuild.1' executable, at the bare mimimum
> doing nothing but
>
> #! /
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 20:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:22:22 +0100
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about having them embedded in the comment as first line as
> > something like
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/env emerge --eapi $foo
>
> Unfortunately the "
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Stuck ranges into metadata.xml for which EAPIs applied?
> > >
> > > No package manager required information can be in XML format.
> >
> > Says who? Us. We can change that, if we decide it's the best answer.
> >
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:22:22 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about having them embedded in the comment as first line as
> something like
>
> #!/usr/bin/env emerge --eapi $foo
Unfortunately the "emerge --eapi $foo" part would be passed as a single
argument to /usr/bi
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:10:13 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, that seems a fine definition of what an eapi is. Everybody agrees on it?
Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager has to export
to an ebuild/eclass. That includes syntax and semantics of expor
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
> > > pink rather than green
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
> > > pink rather than green b
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
> > pink rather than green because you don't like pink (because your
> > last house was green to
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house pink
> rather than green because you don't like pink (because your last house
> was green too), ignoring that it's been demonstrated that when painted
> green, it's impossibl
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:27:05 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I can smell a blatant hack that is just wrong to the bone like a
> lot of other people here.
Clearly not... As you say, you don't care to understand any of this.
You're just jumping in because you think you know what a
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:50 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the
> > > requirements that've previously been described are met?
> >
> > I neither know, nor care.
>
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the
> > requirements that've previously been described are met?
>
> I neither know, nor care.
>
> I just feel very strongly that the current proposal is wrong, and no
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:32 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:04:52 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
> > that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
>
> Alright, s
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:04:52 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
> that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the requirements
that've pr
Jan Kundrát a écrit :
> Roy Marples wrote:
>> I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
>> that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
>
> Do you count "version" as metadata?
I'll bite :)
Version numbers aren't metadata because they uniquely
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:39 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
> > that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
>
> Do you count "version" as metadata?
No.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Roy Marples wrote:
> I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
> that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Do you count "version" as metadata?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 04:16 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> On 12/25/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Ok. So do you use an EAPI 0 environment to do the sourcing, or an EAPI
1 environment, or what?
>>> If it's that such a big deal,
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 04:16 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On 12/25/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok. So do you use an EAPI 0 environment to do the sourcing, or an EAPI
> > > 1 environment, or what?
> >
> > If it's that such a big deal, then simply ensure that
>
> Thankyou for
On Dec 26, 2007 1:19 AM, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - app-text/antiword
I can take this to complete my anti-office collection.
--
Duy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:19:41 +0200 Christian Heim wrote:
> - dev-util/scanmem
I'll take this one if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Aggelos
--
Aggelos Orfanakos, http://agorf.gr/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
32 matches
Mail list logo
