Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I
> thought that goal of -project was to keep devs away from poisonous
> content without impairing their Gentoo-awareness.
I'd like to think that the goal of -project is to let devs who are only
interested in te
for people who maintain a package which utilizes bindnow-flags(), please feel
free to modify the ebuild to no longer use this or append any such ldflags.
the logic for handling set*id bindings is the business of the ldso (aka
glibc), not for ebuilds.
for example, if your ebuild does:
inherit f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> zombieswift/new devs -project
>> council/trustee nominations -project
>
> Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I
> thought that goal of -project was to keep
Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
>
> hello all. i would like to propose that we officially drop support for
> 2.4 kernel profiles (especially default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4). over the
> last few months it has been increasingly difficult to keep 2.4 systems
> up to date.
vanilla-sources is the only plac
hello all. i would like to propose that we officially drop support
for 2.4 kernel profiles (especially default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4).
over the last few months it has been increasingly difficult to keep
2.4 systems up to date. here are some bugs i filed recently
discussing this:
http://
a topic for the gentoo-nfp list since it'd be the trustees making the decision
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> While I think this would be an excellent move, there are a few topics
>> that concern me a bit:
>> 1) just to be sure, did someone check the transfer agreement between the
>> Foundation and the old Gentoo, Inc for potential problems?
>> 2) what would this m
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:11:37 -0600:
> I'm getting them through gmane fine. About 48 posts so far on -project,
> and one test post on -dev-announce.
Yes, I found out my news client installation is buggy, and not seeing
pos
Better late than never: welcome p-y! Yay for french conspiracy
And of course yay for beers in Paris ;)
Le Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:05:51 +0200
Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Pierre-Yves Rofes a écrit :
> > @Remi: Yeah, the french conspiracy strikes again :D
> > btw, I hope we'll have an
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:26:07 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > zombieswift/new devs-project
> > council/trustee nominations -project
>
> Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I
> thought that goal of -proj
Ryan Hill wrote:
> zombieswift/new devs -project
> council/trustee nominations -project
Then it's worth cross-posting -core or -dev-announce or similar. I
thought that goal of -project was to keep devs away from poisonous
content without impairing their Gentoo-awareness.
Duncan wrote:
> Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:29:19 -0500:
>
> [About the project list as carried on gmane.]
>
>> I had to send the confirmation email twice then it started sending me
>> emails. WE may have caught it before we shoul
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> gentoo-dev: This list is for technical discussion, primarily between
> developers, about development and development-related issues that
> directly affect the tree or current projects. For now, no changes are
> made to this list.
technical discussion
> gentoo-projects:
Marius Mauch wrote:
> While I think this would be an excellent move, there are a few topics
> that concern me a bit:
> 1) just to be sure, did someone check the transfer agreement between the
> Foundation and the old Gentoo, Inc for potential problems?
> 2) what would this mean for our copyright si
On 7/21/07, Nathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From what I can tell by reading the logs of the council meeting [1],
the purpose of -project is to keep "all the flamewars and bitching"
off the -dev list.
On 7/21/07, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this is a good idea. I
Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Roy Marples wrote:
I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
they do this.
I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (
Pierre-Yves Rofes a écrit :
@Remi: Yeah, the french conspiracy strikes again :D
btw, I hope we'll have an opportunity to meet all the frenchies near Paris
around some beers one of these days :)
Absolutely ! :)
Rémi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:48:48 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since
> Josh_B has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit,
> since he is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of
> the tre
Le mardi 17 juillet 2007 à 02:20 +0200, Camille Huot a écrit :
> Welcome p-y!
>
> 2007/7/15, Pierre-Yves Rofes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > @Remi: Yeah, the french conspiracy strikes again :D
> > btw, I hope we'll have an opportunity to meet all the frenchies near Paris
> > around some beers one o
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 23:22, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
A bit late but welcome back Sven!
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Lin
On Sunday 22 July 2007, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 July 2007, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Jul 2007)
> > > # Last release from 1999, still using GTK+-1.2.
> > > # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> >
On 7/22/07, Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since Josh_B
has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit, since he
is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of the tree
excluding ChangeLog files s
22 matches
Mail list logo
