Re: [gentoo-dev] app-xemacs/cc-mode not in package app-xemacs/xemacs

2007-06-25 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:13:16 +0200 "John-John Tedro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering why the app-xemacs/xemacs package doesn't include the > cc-mode package since it is widely used. > I had some real troubles figuring this out (mostly since im not very > familiar with the portage syst

[gentoo-dev] app-xemacs/cc-mode not in package app-xemacs/xemacs

2007-06-25 Thread John-John Tedro
I was wondering why the app-xemacs/xemacs package doesn't include the cc-mode package since it is widely used. I had some real troubles figuring this out (mostly since im not very familiar with the portage system). It should just seem natural that it would be. -- Udo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Unifying the behavior of the doc use flag and document it

2007-06-25 Thread Steve Long
Steve Long wrote: > Kent Fredric wrote: >>> ++ I was only thinking of the programmer:user difference, since code >>> docs tend to pull in a lot of stuff, where as end-user docs are normally >>> supplied in an easier format (eg not dox ;) rebuild-docs as a one-shot >>> flag is great. >>> >>> Would t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Hiatus (sort of)

2007-06-25 Thread Philip Webb
070625 Paul de Vrieze wrote: > Now from Hobart, Tasmania (Australia) Don't let the wolves & devils get you (grin). -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Ur