Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> # broken, upstream dead
> app-emacs/cdi
> # they do regular releases, so no live ebuild needed
> app-emacs/erc-cvs
Done.
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Benedikt Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (23 May 2007)
# masked for removal as per #114453
net-www/mod_auth_ldap
apache2 already has ldap authentication modules built-in, will be
removed together with apache 1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional
> . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised,
> all herd tags will be removed and replaced by the
> appropriate tag instead. Work on this will start
Alle mercoledì 23 maggio 2007, Chris Gianelloni ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:49 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional
> > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised,
> > all herd tags will be removed and replaced
Chris Gianelloni schrieb:
> The point is that in cases where the herd
> name doesn't equal the email address used for that herd, the maintainer
> tag should probably be filled in with the proper email address.
I think we have herds.xml for a good reason ;)
-Jokey
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing li
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:49 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional
> . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are raised,
> all herd tags will be removed and replaced by the
> appropriate tag instead. Work on this will start over t
Hi all,
welcome to the IMC - irregular metdata.xml check, issue 1.
As can be seen from the statistcis below, the herd tags have been fixed.
Thanks to those who have helped with the cleanup.
Whats next?
==
The current policy in the devmanual demands a maintainer tag -
nevertheless half t
Hi all.
The Ombudsman project have grown thinner with some members leaving
Gentoo and others not having as much time for it as they used to.
Ombudsman and Developer Relations have therefore made a joint decision
to end the Ombudsman project and instead move conflict mediation to
Developer Relation
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably
> best to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will
> object to normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you
> think?
Speaking for x86/amd64 and Emacs...I am ok with
