# Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17 Apr 2007)
# Pending for removal on 17 May 2007
# Reasons:
#- all keywords are -arch (except for x86)
#- source has numerous QA violations
#- unmaintained for years
net-dialup/slirp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17/04/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since
media-gfx/imagemagick is without an active maintainer and has two open
security bugs #152672 and #173186 (sekretarz seems to be MIA)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152672
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173186
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please upd
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
While there are situations in which you are right about complaining, the
form of some of you
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since those
folks that contributed to my retirement far ou
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:19:24AM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually.
> > Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up
> > having to split things up a good bit into multiple processes to get
> > everyth
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:10:20 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[ ... ]
> Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually.
> Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up
> having to split things up a good bit into multiple processes to get
> everything workin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:05:23 +0100
"Charlie Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/04/07, Matti Bickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dude masterdriverz is like 29, he just masquerades as a young
> >
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 05:03 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:50:58AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src.
> > > getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this m
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:50:58AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src.
> > getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this mmap fails, 'Could not mmap fd: Invalid argument'
> > mlmmj-send.c
>
Raúl Porcel wrote:
> Use repoman || die :)
I doubt repoman would catch it, but having similar line in ebuild would
basically render use flag useless ;-)
Love,
H
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 05:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Anybody that feels like inspecting C code, look at mlmmj-1.2.14/src.
> getaddrsfromfd.c:27 - this mmap fails, 'Could not mmap fd: Invalid argument'
> mlmmj-send.c
Is it possible we're hitting > 1024 fd open? We have had a similar
proble
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 07:57 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Tenorman_Must_Die
> >
> > I say we never piss Chris off again... ever...
>
> Thank YOU! That was hilarious!
>
> But seriously.. why don't you guys switch off reply-to munging, alre
Use repoman || die :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
