Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:20 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: >> On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: >> >>> ..but finding sources I can use for the following jars has been kicking my butt: >>> Acme.jar >> The entire Acme package is here:- >> ht

Re: [gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d

On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote: > As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d` > Does it make sense to allow both styles? not really > Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd? yes please -mike pg

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

On Sunday 08 April 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > sys-apps/mii-diag > > Can this one just go away? Is there anything that it does that ethtool > doesn't do? yeah, newer net-tools integrates this package > > sys-libs/nss-db > > My name should be on this one already. i specifically checked beca

[gentoo-dev] doenvd vs. insinto /etc/env.d

Hello, I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d. As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is 1) cleaner and easier to read 2) more portable (for systems that use something other than /etc/env.d, for example) Does

[gentoo-dev] Re: base packages up for grabs

Mike Frysinger wrote: > working here is no longer fun * HUGZ * -- where to now? if i had to guess dirtyepic gentoo orgi'm afraid to say antarctica's next 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

I'm one of the folks on the base-system alias already, but here's the key stuff that I interact with, and some other related notes. Put me down for the following: > sys-process/supervise-scripts > sys-apps/smartmontools > sys-apps/sg3_utils > sys-apps/dmidecode > sys-apps/ethtool > sys-apps/microc

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-04-08 23h59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-04-08 23h59 UTC. Removals: games-board/pysol-cardsets 2007-04-02 19:31:27 tupone net-news/hellanzb 2007-04-05 18:37:26 aballier x11-misc/klineakconfig

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:20 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: > > > ..but finding sources I can use for the following jars has been kicking > > > my butt: > > Acme.jar > The entire Acme package is here:- > http://www.acme.com/resources/classes

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

On Sunday 08 April 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > sys-apps/byld > > sys-apps/yard > > sys-apps/mkinitrd > > app-admin/superadduser > > I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. three of those should be a cake walk ... mkinitrd is a friggin mess though, so a

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> sys-apps/byld >> sys-apps/yard >> sys-apps/mkinitrd >> app-admin/superadduser > > I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. > >> sys-boot/syslinux > > And this, but a bit less intereste

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

Mike Frysinger wrote: > sys-apps/byld > sys-apps/yard > sys-apps/mkinitrd > app-admin/superadduser I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them. > sys-boot/syslinux And this, but a bit less interested... Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

Alle domenica 08 aprile 2007, Mike Frysinger ha scritto: > working here is no longer fun; the following are up for grabs > ... drop me a line if something interests you > net-misc/netkit-rsh I know it very well (patches are mine) so I can maintain it. Happy Easter to .* :) -- Timothy `Drizzt` Re

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

On Sunday 08 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > working here is no longer fun; the following are up for > > grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you > > So you are looking to remove these things from the base-system herd or > new people to join the herd? w

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > working here is no longer fun; the following are up for grabs > ... > drop me a line if something interests you So you are looking to remove these things from the base-system herd or new people to join the herd? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > So, fellow devs, what's new with development? > > As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies > on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: > ..but finding sources I

[gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

working here is no longer fun; the following are up for grabs ... drop me a line if something interests you app-benchmarks/nbench sys-power/nvram-wakeup sys-power/nvram-reboot sys-power/athcool sys-process/runit sys-process/minit sys-process/schedutils sys-process/acct sys-process/atop sys-proces

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Jeffrey Gardner wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > >> So, fellow devs, what's new with development? >> > > As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies > on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: > > dev-java/ant-core > dev-java/ant-contri

Re: [Off-topic] Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 09:19 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > I think we all should do our part in asking people to keep things on > topic, and for discussions to move to the proper lists. If it isn't > about development, it doesn't belong here. Yes and at min, if it does go off topic and remain

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Joseph Jezak wrote: > I like this thread! Indeed! This thread is fun - and fun is what Gentoo should be about. > The PPC team had a bugday yesterday and managed to get almost 70 > bugs off of our list of open issues! Thanks to nixnut, mabi, > dertobi123 and ndansmith for helping to clean up the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tears of unfathomable sorrow

Hi. Alec Warner wrote: > Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done > most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits > are left). > I, for one, have no joy in seeing you leave. > Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming.

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Michael Cummings wrote: > So, fellow devs, what's new with development? 2007.0 handbooks. I am t3h master of the handbooks. They're basically done, unless I actually hear from arch teams that changes are needed. I've been working my keister off; I think I racked up >100 commits for these things. P

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 19:03 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > So, fellow devs, what's new with development? For those interested, genlop has > migrated into gentoo as a project with the permission of upstream, which no > longer maintain it. Um...any new tools or projects people are working on? When

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Michael Cummings wrote: > When you pop into your mail client of choice and find 50+ unread messages in > the > last few hours, you know what kind of day [EMAIL PROTECTED] is having. > > Don't suppose we could get on with that silly topical thing of development? > Surely there's a usenet channel w

[gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested users filing bugs, so genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release based on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjoy :) -- -o()o-- Michael

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Michael Cummings wrote: > So, fellow devs, what's new with development? For those interested, genlop has > migrated into gentoo as a project with the permission of upstream, which no > longer maintain it. Um...any new tools or projects people are working on? > > Anyone? > I'm currently fixing al

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tears of unfathomable sorrow

Alec Warner wrote: > Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done > most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits > are left). > > Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming. I don't get > along with many like I used to and in

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

To encourage the positive discussion around actual development, I've been working on the following: * Upcoming media and stages for the release with the releng team * PS3 stages and media. This is going quite well and Gentoo, if I can say so, has been a leader in PS3 adoption. Interested devs

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Petteri Räty a écrit : Rémi Cardona kirjoitti: Oh and I'm working on an updated gnome2 eclass, as the current one reads data in /var/db. Fixing this should fix gnome/xfce packages for paludis users among other benefits. If anyone wants to fix env saving in portage, it would help us a lot :) E

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-db/c-jdbc

+# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (08 Apr 2007) +# Still generation 1 and we are one major version behind +# 30 days and in junkyard unless someone expresses a need +# for this package. Do it in: +# https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157427 +dev-db/c-jdbc + signature.asc Description: Open

Re: [gentoo-dev] resolvconf

On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roy Marples wrote: > > A new version of resolvconf-gentoo is about to be released which > > also works with dash and busybox. Also, the next resolvconf script > > for dnsmasq will (also due out soon) supports updating

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 19:16 +0100, George Prowse wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 09:45 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > >> Here is what I'm doing these days.. > >> > > > > Let's see. I'm currently leading the 2007.0 release, which includes > > building LiveDVD releas

Re: [Off-topic] Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:38 -0700, Steven De Bock wrote: > Hi, > > I really like the way where this mailinglist is heading with this > topic. I subscribed to this mailing list a while ago with the hope to > read more stuff like this, rather than all those rants from the > previous days. > > I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

Michael Cummings wrote: > So, fellow devs, what's new with development? As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of: dev-java/ant-core dev-java/ant-contrib dev-java/commons-cli dev-java/itext dev-java/ju

[gentoo-dev] Re: Tears of unfathomable sorrow

Alec Warner wrote: > I expect to still file patches for portage and I expect to hang out in > gentoo-dev-help on irc and I expect to mentor for this years summer of > code. > I might be wrong, but my impression is you can't do that without being a dev. So how about just hanging on til end of summe

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-misc/gfontview

»Q« wrote: > In , > Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 070407 Stefan Schweizer wrote: >> > # masked for removal: no release since 2001, build broken, bug >> > 154671 app-misc/gfontview >> >> I have added a comment to the bug. >> If you want to remove this package