On Wed, Apr 4, 2007 at 22:27:45 +0200, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Alexandre Buisse wrote: [Wed Apr 04 2007, 02:36:43PM CDT]
> > I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
> > discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
> > since it seems there is n
federico wrote:
> Steve Long ha scritto:
>> What benefits does it show; why would I want it on my machine?
>>
> because it provides a place to store those settings;
>
latency timer settings? the coder in me can like that idea, the usr wants to
know "so what?"
> although I don't like wrapping
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> All,
>
> Please except my apologies for the strong language in my initial
> response to this. I've been informed that Samir is the real deal and
> not just a marketing droid.
>
Apology not accepted. Your language definitely wasn't strong enough.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.
All,
Please except my apologies for the strong language in my initial
response to this. I've been informed that Samir is the real deal and
not just a marketing droid.
The things that set me off were:
1. Cross posting the same message to a bunch of different mailing lists
2. The HTML formatting
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I deliberately wrote the GLEP that way. The
> truth of the matter is that the Council has only whatever power the
> devs permit, so adding additional restrictions seems like a really bad
> idea to me.
grant++
Seriously, if enough de
Hello gentoo ppl,
As you all probably know, the next bugday is helt next saturnday :-)
So feel free to view the website and stick around in #gentoo-bugs on
freenode. Don't be scared to bug the ops/voices for help if needed,
that's what they're there for :-)
Have a nice bugday all! ;-)
Regards,
-
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the metastructure
glep.
I'm not going to write an essay because I don't have the t
Alexandre Buisse wrote: [Wed Apr 04 2007, 02:36:43PM CDT]
> I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
> discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
> since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the metastructure
> glep.
For what it's wort
Steve Long ha scritto:
> What benefits does it show; why would I want it on my machine?
>
cause you don't want to write setpci stuff in /etc/conf.d/local.start ;D
seriously: because you can disable it by a kernel command line
'nopciparm' (like the hdparm script does); because it provides a pl
On Sun, Apr 1, 2007 at 12:32:06 +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1500 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe
federico wrote:
> Today I created a little init script in the flavour of hdparm, that is:
> a config file (/etc/conf.d/pciparm) to tweak PCI latency parameters.
> I don't know if others PCI registers deserve attention (I just use
> latency_timer), so I want to submit this to your attention and hear
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> I compiled a list of things that i think need to be done such as
> defining some general guidelines for work,
sorry, due to the thread (things for Council to talk about), i thought the
work you were talking about was stuff for the Council to di
hello list,
I just subscribed to this list. Let me introduce myself: I'm an italian
Gentoo user (from 3 yrs or so), student in Computer Science Engineering,
occasionally developer.
Sometimes I did some ebuild contributions through bugzilla (with this
email adress).
Today I created a little init s
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:55:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> > Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
> > to throw in my 2 cents here.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> >
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
> to throw in my 2 cents here.
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > -
Since i tried to get things running for the last week or two, i need
to throw in my 2 cents here.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > some topics off the top of my head:
> > - unaddressed CoC issue
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:51:56AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> some topics off the top of my head:
> - unaddressed CoC issues:
> - add a "mission" statement
> - fix wording to have a positive spin
> - what else ?
We need quite a few more people on the CoC team. One reason bein
Mike Doty wrote:
apparent decline of QA in our packages.
Anyone got numbers for that? Talking opinions, as in the SCM discussion,
isn't real meaningful.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
