Hi,
On Wednesday, 18 October 2006, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> I think this scheme is more in line with our Emacs approach in
> portage. This has been a popular system for those who want a
> distro-maintained Emacs build but want to use their own configuration.
> We install Emacs libraries to /us
Hi all,
just a heads up that I added a generic 2-clause BSD license to the tree.
Its name is BSD-2.
The BSD license file still refers to the 3-clause BSD license.
kind regards
Thilo
pgp5BJ932YbCp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Hmm.. what about a minimal-media like system which could exploit unionfs
> and provide similar functionality to DSL (Damn Small Linux)?
I was working on livecd's a few months ago. DSL turned unionfs off by
default do to buginess.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm considering replacing the common-lisp-controller system in Portage
with and opt-in, asdf-binary-locations approach.
The main purpose of the c-l-c is to provide a way to compile the
source in /usr/share/common-lisp to a user read/writable location
(currently the c-l-c uses /var/cache/common-lis
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 22:26 -0400, Tomasz B Mloduchowski wrote:
> Hmm.. what about a minimal-media like system which could exploit unionfs
> and provide similar functionality to DSL (Damn Small Linux)?
Feel free to submit patches to genkernel to make unionfs actually work
on our releases and we'd
