George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> What I propose is to create a TLP page for "Gentoo Programming Resources" (or
> pick your name) and move all the individual languages into the subdirs of it.
> Any opinions? If I get any "yay's" or no "nays" I'll create a bug about it
> and
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:35 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Eldad Zack wrote:
> > Christian Heim wrote:
> >> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Alon "alonbl" Bar-Lev, the latest
> >> addition joining to help out with the crypto herd.
> >>
> >> He hails from Israel (hrm, they don't have c
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:08:31 +0100
"Stuart Herbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use space-delimited USE flags everywhere else. It would make a lot
> of sense to keep it consistent here.
We also use space-delimited depend atoms everywhere else. It makes no
sense to break that when a comma wor
Dominique Michel wrote:
> It seam at it is a big problem with the livecd.
>
>>From the forum:
> QUOTE: The problem is you can't use the GTK installer due to this problem. It
> crashes out and leaves you with no option but to wash, rinse, repeat,
> re-crash.
>
> By saying they won't fix the bug
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:08:31 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd mean they were
| > no longer simply space delimited. Commas [foo,-bar,baz] would be
| > fine...
|
| Writ
Hi George,
On 10/11/06, George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi gang.
As I looked for a place where to put some documentation naturally falling in
a "project domain" for Ada, I realized that we have TLPs for many individual
(programming) languages. First I though to ping some people on
On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd mean they were no
longer simply space delimited. Commas [foo,-bar,baz] would be fine...
Write a better parser then :P
We use space-delimited USE flags everywhere else. It would make a
Hi Zac,
This is all good news.
On 10/11/06, Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Default USE flags at the ebuild and/or profile level [2].
This one would be very very useful for Seeds, if we can set per-ebuild
USE flags at the profile level.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mai
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:52:08 -0400 (EDT) "Michael Sterrett -Mr.
Bones.-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What's the point of all the square brackets? Is there some benefit
| over just [foo -bar baz]?
Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:52:08 -0400 (EDT) "Michael Sterrett -Mr.
Bones.-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What's the point of all the square brackets? Is there some benefit
| over just [foo -bar baz]?
Spaces in dep atoms would be highly evil, since it'd mean they were no
longer simply space delimited
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:52:08PM -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${S
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
| > |
| > | I thought we were eventually
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
> |
> | I thought we were eventually going to use that format to specify
> | deps with specific USE set.
>
> That's [use].
I
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 12:18 -0400, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> I fear the idea that valid bugs may be closed do to a -march=i586.
If they're a bug dealing with an issue only present on < i686, then yes,
they likely would be, at least for release media, unless you also
provide a patch. This is what bei
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
|
| I thought we were eventually going to use that format to specify
| deps with specific USE set.
That's [use].
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web
Am Mittwoch, 11. Oktober 2006 20:36 schrieb Brian Jackson:
> On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
encies.
> > * The world and system sets allow automatic update of all installed
> > slots.
> > * DEPEND atoms support SLOT dependencies of the form
> > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
Yay!
> I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> * DEPEND atoms support SLOT dependencies of the form
>> ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
>
> No way, it happened!!
>
> So when can we start actually using this feature?
We can either wait until several mon
On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
actively working on this atm?
It's been on my todo list, but I haven't gotten around to it yet due
to othe
Zac Medico wrote:
> * DEPEND atoms support SLOT dependencies of the form
> ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
No way, it happened!!
So when can we start actually using this feature?
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
> actively working on this atm?
It's been on my todo list, but I haven't gotten around to it yet due
to other portage work that's kept me extremely busy. I h
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 17:24 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Hi gang.
>
> As I looked for a place where to put some documentation naturally falling in
> a "project domain" for Ada, I realized that we have TLPs for many individual
> (programming) languages. First I though to ping some people on
I fear the idea that valid bugs may be closed do to a -march=i586.
release media should not have to be tuned to i386. perhaps thes older
machines shouldn't be a priority, but that doesn't mean they should
become completely unsupported. if a general move to i686 is desired
perhaps the archs should
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:46:05 +0200:
> A couple of years ago (when we were still using gcc-2.95 I used to run
> gentoo on my server machine which was a pentium-60 (with fdiv bug). While
> it took a while to compile the
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue,
10 Oct 2006 12:24:21 -0400:
> There's a difference between "support" and "ability". You will retain the
> ability to install on < i686 machines. We just don't want to support it.
> This means we aren't goin
Eldad Zack wrote:
> Christian Heim wrote:
>> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Alon "alonbl" Bar-Lev, the latest
>> addition joining to help out with the crypto herd.
>>
>> He hails from Israel (hrm, they don't have cities down there ?). So
>> far it looks like Alon is completely constrained to h
Hi gang.
As I looked for a place where to put some documentation naturally falling in
a "project domain" for Ada, I realized that we have TLPs for many individual
(programming) languages. First I though to ping some people on irc, but, as I
went down the page the noticed number became nontrivia
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:59:59 +0100 Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
| actively working on this atm?
There's a full implementation in Paludis. I believe Christel was
working on backporting it to the legacy package manag
Hi,
Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
actively working on this atm?
Best regards,
Stu
--
--
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
29 matches
Mail list logo
