On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:43 +, Peter wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
Since you mentioned my name in your e-mail I figured I had something to
do with the delay on your becoming a developer, however, having
consulted bugzilla I find that this is not the case. Rat
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
>
>> From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
>> asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
>> way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
>> don't like the idea of them spri
Lance Albertson wrote:
> From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
> asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
> way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
> don't like the idea of them springing a release and then
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
>
> Thanks in advance!
I think I agree with the others. Excellent idea though; thanks for
giving this issue your attention.
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Sep 2006)
# masked app-crypt/hashsum for treecleaners, bug(s) 148530
# Pending Removal Oct 22th
app-crypt/hashsum
Masked as requested by Hanno Boeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Christian Heim
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CA
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 23:06, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> A GLEP doesn't have to be bureaucracy. It can be nothing more than a
> way of ensuring that the correct technical decisions are made. For a
> project that could end up affecting a lot of people, getting the design
> right and determinin
