Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> After reading the response for bug 118607, which i filed, i was
> woundering if there isn't a more appropriate default procedure for
> packages with no homepages then just leaving the invalid 'homepage-link'
> alone ... Shouldn't there be a way to tell po
Monthly Gentoo Council Meeting for Jan 2006.
Present:
Koon (Thierry Carrez)
Swift (Sven Vermeulen)
agriffis (Aron Griffis)
seemant (Seemant Kulleen)
solar (Ned Ludd)
vapier (Mike Frysinger)
Absent:
azarah (Martin Schlemmer)
Where abouts unknown for the last 30 days.
Attendance by
On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:42, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 07:56:30AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > You guys are more than welcome to go apply at Red Hat or Novell.
>
> Some of us already work for companies that produce other Linux
> distributions or support the companies that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lo,
On Thursday 12 January 2006 16:45, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think
> everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup.
I know that the latest versions of gnome now are using cryptsetu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
lo,
On Thursday 12 January 2006 17:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think
> > everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup.
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think
> everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup.
We're still using cryptsetup on the InstallCD/LiveCD. Should we switch?
What's the differences?
--
Chris Gianello
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As stated in bug #74396, all ebuilds using kernel-mod.eclass must be
> converted to using either linux-mod.eclass and/or linux-info.eclass.
>
> The bug has been open since 2004-12-14, yet there are still ebuilds in
> the tree which inherits kernel-mod.eclass:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:41:41PM +0100, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > And if someone wants to forward this over to -user, feel free.
>
> Do you want to have this kernel documented in our Kernel guide [1]?
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml#doc_chap3
That would be
Duncan wrote:
app-arch/pbzip2
It covers only bzip2, but proves that it can be done. I tend to like it
for catalyst, since it helps a lot on SMP machines.
Very cool! I didn't know that existed. It could be quite useful here on
my dual Opteron. Thanks!
For those who wondered what might be
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:11:27 -0500:
> app-arch/pbzip2
>
> It covers only bzip2, but proves that it can be done. I tend to like it
> for catalyst, since it helps a lot on SMP machines.
Very cool! I didn't know that existed. It coul
Ferris McCormick posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:59:43 +:
> This list is not necessarily complete, nor is everything on the list
> necessarily appropriate for reporting to devrel. But it should give some
> idea of the sorts of things that are helpful for b
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:23 +0200, Philippe Trottier wrote:
> Make this distributed tool for tar zip bzip2 and gzip and I'm in, I don't
> think
> it would be useful with anything else than Gigabit Ethernet.
app-arch/pbzip2
It covers only bzip2, but proves that it can be done. I tend to like it
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:08 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Ferris McCormick posted
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
> Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:04:19 +:
>
> > B. "Jurisdiction" --- why this is something for devrel to consider (policy
> > violation or whatever). This is a categorization of the r
for this month:
* GLEP 45 - GLEP date format
* disallow multiple votes per person (from ciaranm)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11346783302&r=1&w=2
* global gentoo goals for 2006
for next month:
* periodically freezing the tree for new packages (from carlo)
i miss anything ?
-mike
--
gent
Hi,
As stated in bug #74396, all ebuilds using kernel-mod.eclass must be
converted to using either linux-mod.eclass and/or linux-info.eclass.
The bug has been open since 2004-12-14, yet there are still ebuilds in
the tree which inherits kernel-mod.eclass:
$ find . -name "*.ebuild"|xargs grep inh
Greg KH wrote:
> And if someone wants to forward this over to -user, feel free.
Do you want to have this kernel documented in our Kernel guide [1]?
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml#doc_chap3
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description:
Lisa Seelye wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:18 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Lisa Seelye wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:51 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I've been cleaning up media-fonts/ to work with modular-X, and I s
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:51:46 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been cleaning up media-fonts/ to work with modular-X, and I see a
> lot of ebuilds with stuff like this:
> for font in *.bdf; do
> /usr/X11R6/bin/bdftopcf ${font} > `basename $font .bdf`.pcf
> d
18 matches
Mail list logo
