Hi,
this week I had problems re-emerging amarok after upgrading KDE to 3.5 and
removing 3.4. Several *.la files in /usr/lib still had lines
containing /usr/kde/3.4. I fixed this manually using
find /usr/lib -name "*.la" -exec sed -i s%/kde/3.4/%/kde/3.5/%g {} \;
which made "emerge amarok" happ
On 12/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone (existing developers only please, I'm not recruiting) use vile?
> If so, congratulations. You just volunteered to maintain it, starting
> with bug #114178. You can join the Vim herd (which seems to own all the
> vi clones for some biza
LOL. Sorry, subject line gave me the chuckles.
-m
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 +
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting.
> future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we
> cant remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders
> to go out on t
Anyone (existing developers only please, I'm not recruiting) use vile?
If so, congratulations. You just volunteered to maintain it, starting
with bug #114178. You can join the Vim herd (which seems to own all the
vi clones for some bizarre reason) or maintain it separately if you
prefer.
--
Ciara
this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting.
future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we cant
remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders to go
out on the first :)
current agenda:
none ?!
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
For your benefit, here's my world file. You can determine whether your
app's in the list by replacing yours with it, then running 'emerge -ep
world'.
It was pointed out that I worded this poorly. Rather than replacing, you
should back up your own file, copy mine in, then
On Tuesday 06 of December 2005 23:28 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Yeah so... I don't really know what your last name means... Only thing
> close that I see is "female repoductive organ" but of the 4 letter
> variation. I dunno... Lemme know... maybe even off list.. :-D
Bingo, I see you already know all
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
So is there now a safe, correct way of specifying modular X
dependencies that will actually work?
It will work when I pull the virtual/x11 from base/virtuals this
weekend. Until then, it will wrongly think xorg-x11-7 ebuilds provide
the virtual.
See my recent post on
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:18:58 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X,
| starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing
| to many of your applications, libraries, etc.
So is there now a safe, corr
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:27 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> | I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X,
> | starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to
> | many of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X,
| starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to
| many of your applications, libraries, etc.
|
| If you don't trust my ability to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm planning on porting every installed app on my system to modular X,
starting in the next couple of days. This means I will be committing to
many of your applications, libraries, etc.
If you don't trust my ability to do this or otherwise don't want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
| On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|>Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|>| As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
|>| and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
|>
|>I've jus
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:15:49 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the
> > questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size
> > reduction). And
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:04, Marius Mauch wrote:
> As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the
> questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size
> reduction). And so far I haven't seen any sufficient answer to
> questions I raised on -core and -por
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
> | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
>
> I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_b
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:07:01PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> I changed it to a 301 redirect, but this isn't something I'm going to spend
> a lot of time fiddling with. What's there didn't take a lot of time to set
> up and doesn't require a lot of effort to maintain. IOW, I hope this is
> "good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
| As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
| and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if you
19 matches
Mail list logo
