Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86

2005-12-02 Thread Philip Webb
051202 Mark Loeser wrote: > GCC 3.4 has finally been marked stable on x86. ... > To assist you in the migration we have made a GCC migration guide[1]. ... > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/x86/gcc-upgrading-guide.xml This looks a model of clarity & (let's hope on the day: smile) accuracy

[gentoo-dev] GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86

2005-12-02 Thread Mark Loeser
GCC 3.4 has finally been marked stable on x86. No one will have their compiler automatically switched to gcc-3.4 after it is installed, so you can handle the migration to using it as your system compiler when you have time. To assist you in the migration we have made a GCC migration guide[1]. For

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote: > On 12/2/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sure, in Gentoo it's been fixed (i know cause i fixed it), but every > > other distro i know of the boot system would bomb > > Since when is Gentoo supporting other

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Matthijs van der Vleuten
On 12/2/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sure, in Gentoo it's been fixed (i know cause i fixed it), but every > other distro i know of the boot system would bomb Since when is Gentoo supporting other distro's boot systems? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:00:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:17:38PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > That being said, my boxes have an empty /dev... > > > > you so sure about that ? if your /dev is completely

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:17:38PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > That being said, my boxes have an empty /dev... > > you so sure about that ? if your /dev is completely empty, you wont > get any init output because the kernel cant find

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 04:15:30PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote: > Matthias Langer wrote: > > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in the > > /dev directory. > > And this is not only true for the box where i discovered this, which was > > brought up from a > > 2004.x cd

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Petteri Räty
Matthias Langer wrote: > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in the /dev > directory. > And this is not only true for the box where i discovered this, which was > brought up from a > 2004.x cd, but also true for the box where i just installed gentoo from > 2005.1-r1

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:32PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > That being said, my boxes have an empty /dev... you so sure about that ? if your /dev is completely empty, you wont get any init output because the kernel cant find /dev/console ... and the init scripts will get pissed when they try to pi

Re: [gentoo-dev] contents of /dev after initial installation

2005-12-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:45:00PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > maillog: 02/12/2005-02:47:55(+): Stephen Bennett types > > On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:35:23 +0100 > > Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > revealed that there are in fact hundrets of premade device nodes in > > > th