On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:53 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> And LiveCD installers is nice, but what I need is a Sysprep-Installer
> like when someone turns on his windows PC the first time, where you
> can setuo hostname/user/password and maybe network.
> Is anything like that available for Linux?
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:52 +0200, dju` wrote:
> > Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over
> > browserplugin?
This may not be a particularly _good_ reason, but "nsplugin" is already
an accepted global USE flag.
> At any rate, it is pr
anyone care if i move the lua USE flag to global scope ? noticed it was still
local when bumping swig ...
app-editors/scite:lua - Enable Lua scripting support
app-mobilephone/yaps:lua - Enable Lua scripting support
dev-lang/swig:lua - Enable Lua scripting support
games-fps/alephone:lua - Enable
On Monday 17 October 2005 23:14, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Actually, I think it is plugin-compatible with netscape, not necessarily
> netscape-based. For example, Konquerer can use the same plugins. At
> any rate, it is probably best to think about this now, hence using
> nsplugin, rather than la
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:52 +0200, dju` wrote:
> Hanno Böck wrote:
> > Before this discussion sleeps, what should be the conclusion?
> > For now, the situation in the tree is :
> > - java-stuff uses browserplugin
> > - acroread uses noplugin
> > - helixplayer/realplayer/vlc/gxine/djvu use nsplugin
Hanno Böck wrote:
Before this discussion sleeps, what should be the conclusion?
For now, the situation in the tree is :
- java-stuff uses browserplugin
- acroread uses noplugin
- helixplayer/realplayer/vlc/gxine/djvu use nsplugin
Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over browserpl
Aron Griffis wrote:
> Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
> USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
> the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
> USE=nsplugin was more appropriate.
>
> http://www.mail-archive
On 10/17/05, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point I think it would still be worthwhile to repair these
> ebuilds to respect USE=nsplugin and drop the browserplugin from
> use.local.desc. Comments?
Thank you for proposing it. Will solve the current confusion.
Please go ahead and
Chris Gianelloni wrote:[Mon Oct 17 2005, 03:21:35PM EDT]
> Agreed 100%. USE=mozilla shouldn't be used for plugins when we already
> have a perfectly good USE flag for it.
Thanks, but that's not the point. The point is to switch them from
using the local USE=browserplugin to using the existing gl
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 14:50 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> At this point I think it would still be worthwhile to repair these
> ebuilds to respect USE=nsplugin and drop the browserplugin from
> use.local.desc. Comments?
Agreed 100%. USE=mozilla shouldn't be used for plugins when we already
have
On Monday 17 of October 2005 20:42 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> This might be a bit of a problematic choice...
For more details about why we've chosen to recommend the in-kernel way please
see bug 92622 [1].
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub
Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
USE=nsplugin was more appropriate.
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
On Monday 17 October 2005 20:25, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Change virtual/alsa to match virtual/kernel-sources in
> base/virtuals, and change virtual/alsa to alsa-driver on architectures
> still using a 2.4 kernel.
This might be a bit of a problematic choice... I usually suggest using
alsa-driver
While discussing a couple issues I was having with automated tinderbox
testing of gnome/kde on x86, it was decided that now might be a good
time to visit the default virtual for alsa. Basically, the Gentoo Linux
ALSA Guide[1] recommends using the in-kernel ALSA. We are also using
2.6 kernels as t
Apart from some minor issues GLEP 38 has been final for quite some
time, so we've officially set its status to final on the GLEP page
[1].
Even if not standard procedure, here's a quick summary of what has
been done:
All global moderators and administrators are official staff members
(or have at le
-Original Message-
From: Luca Longinotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:48 PM
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla Bug #109301 dev-db/mysql-4.1.14 stable
request.
Francesco R. wrote:
>mysql-4.1.14 has been added to the tree on 2
Francesco R. wrote:
>mysql-4.1.14 has been added to the tree on 29 Aug 2005, should be time
>to stabilize the 4.1 branch of mysql.
>
>ARCH teams, robbat2, php-herd, thoughts ?
>
>If no one is versus I'll stabilize 4.1.14 for "x86" and "amd64" tomorrow
>(with dev-perl/DBD-mysql-2.9007), then mysq
mysql-4.1.14 has been added to the tree on 29 Aug 2005, should be time
to stabilize the 4.1 branch of mysql.
ARCH teams, robbat2, php-herd, thoughts ?
If no one is versus I'll stabilize 4.1.14 for "x86" and "amd64" tomorrow
(with dev-perl/DBD-mysql-2.9007), then mysql-5.0 will be unmasked.
Fur
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 09:49 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> These packages infuriate me, and quite frankly, I have no need for them
> for release building. Basically, I don't want to maintain them any
> more. I plan on adding a "libkudzu" ebuild, which will fulfill the
> dependency for hwsetup,
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:53 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Well, catalyst is not really good for that because I need something
> that I can constantly upgrade without recompiling everything .. that
> is a live system for me at the moment.
Because there isn't any way to cache packages in catalyst
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 15:06 +0800, Shuduo Sang wrote:
> I want to know is there any way to install a gentoo to an embedded system?
> For example, ipaq. Because those samll devices do not have enough effort to
> build a system from stage1. But it still need a portage-like way to upgrade
> packages.
On 10/14/05, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer posted
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> below, on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:33:57 +0200:
> > [..]
> > Anyone knows of something like a "sysprep" script for linux that will
> > ask the costumer for user and passwort setup when he first
Am Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:06:29 +0800
schrieb Shuduo Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to know is there any way to install a gentoo to an embedded system?
> For example, ipaq. Because those samll devices do not have enough effort to
> build a system from stage1. But it still need a portage-like way
I want to know is there any way to install a gentoo to an embedded system?
For example, ipaq. Because those samll devices do not have enough effort to
build a system from stage1. But it still need a portage-like way to upgrade
packages.
2005/10/14, Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
