Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about java builds and the sandbox...

2005-09-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 30 September 2005 11:14 pm, Saleem A. wrote: > $ROOT can be something other than / in > theory (not 100% sure that it is fully supported yet or not). if there is a package which doesnt support ROOT, it is broken and needs to be fixed ... nothing should ever hard code / in pkg_* function

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about java builds and the sandbox...

2005-09-30 Thread Saleem A.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote: > If I have an ant build.xml file that creates and populates an /opt/dnebing > directory but runs as part of an ebuild, will it actually create > the /opt/dnebing directory or is it made as part of the image > in /var/tmp/portage/dnebing/image directory

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about java builds and the sandbox...

2005-09-30 Thread Tres Melton
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 21:59 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote: > Okay, hopefully this works as I expect, but... > > If I have an ant build.xml file that creates and populates an /opt/dnebing > directory but runs as part of an ebuild, will it actually create > the /opt/dnebing directory or is it made as

[gentoo-dev] Question about java builds and the sandbox...

2005-09-30 Thread Dave Nebinger
Okay, hopefully this works as I expect, but... If I have an ant build.xml file that creates and populates an /opt/dnebing directory but runs as part of an ebuild, will it actually create the /opt/dnebing directory or is it made as part of the image in /var/tmp/portage/dnebing/image directory?

Re: [gentoo-dev] default logger

2005-09-30 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > How about we just use sysklogd ? It does not depend on glib or any > other package that would not be pulled in by default in system profile. > It have a sane config. It logs to /var/log/message, etc. It supports > network logging. Bla

Re: [gentoo-dev] default logger

2005-09-30 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:05 -0500, Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:29 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:57 -0500, Brian Harring wrote: > > > > I'd rather see reasons listed as to why

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 arch team leads

2005-09-30 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 07:36 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: > | Well, the x86 team has now chosen some leads so we can start getting > | everything together as a team. For our leads, we have chosen to have a > | "committee" of 4 of us: halcy0n, solar, azarah, and wolf32o2. We each > | felt that we didn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 arch team leads

2005-09-30 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Loeser wrote: | Well, the x86 team has now chosen some leads so we can start getting | everything together as a team. For our leads, we have chosen to have a | "committee" of 4 of us: halcy0n, solar, azarah, and wolf32o2. We each | felt that we