On Saturday 24 September 2005 10:14 am, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote:
> > - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed
> >icon-set, error documents, and default website. This has been put in
> >it's own
On Saturday 24 September 2005 15:23, Jakub Moc wrote:
> 24.9.2005, 16:14:41, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote:
> >> - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed
> >>icon-set, error documents, and default webs
24.9.2005, 16:14:41, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote:
>> - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed
>>icon-set, error documents, and default website. This has been put in
>>it's own package, and includ
On Thursday 08 September 2005 03:48, Michael Stewart (vericgar) wrote:
> - A new gentoo-webroot that will eventually provide a gentoo-themed
>icon-set, error documents, and default website. This has been put in
>it's own package, and includes a USE-flag to not install the
>gentoo-webro
Mike Frysinger posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:17:01 -0400:
>> We still have KEYWORDS="-*". Sure, I know many do not like it, and if
>> something was decided in regards to it, I missed it, but it is generally
>> seen as 'less severe' than a package.mask'd mask
Jason Stubbs posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:47:09 +0900:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 05:51, Aron Griffis wrote:
>> Regarding GLEP 31, the council is in favor of enforcement ASAP,
>> provided nano is confirmed to be capable of compliance. That will set
>> th
