-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This package was due for removal on May 1 2005, having been replaced by
media-video/spca5xx. Unless someone objects in the next 7 days, I will
remove it from the tree.
- --
===
Mike Doty
Icky on the html email :P
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:45:16PM -0700, m h wrote:
> Hello-
> I'm investigating the similarities between portage and openpkg. More
> specifically I was wondering if it is possible to take portage and
> install in on top of an existing linux installation in its own sand
The ppc team has found a new minion^W AT to help them out. Matti Bickel
(mabi) has stepped up for abuse from JoseJX.. Please welcome him to the
team! JoseJX, don't work him to hard! j/k, Where's the whip? ;)
--
Homer Parker
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Strategic Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
g
The Gentoo Apache Team is pleased to announce the stabilizing of package
updates that have been in the works for over a year. Some of the major
changes include:
- New configuration and configuration locations to more closely match
upstream and reduce confusion for users coming from other
di
Hello-
I'm investigating the similarities between portage and openpkg.
More specifically I was wondering if it is possible to take portage and
install in on top of an existing linux installation in its own sandbox
(similar to what openpkg does). I've done some googling and found
the documentatio
I will soon mask/remove y-windows due to a dead (and abusive) upstream
(see bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100072 ). libiterm-mbt
is a library associated with y-windows that will also and
app-i18n/fbiterm is the only application that depends on it, belonging
to the cjk herd.
I'm
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 01:16 pm, Olivier Fisette wrote:
> I was told
> that demasking USE flags is only done when packages hit the
> stable branch.
this is incorrect
demasking a USE flag only requires you not break packages ... so if your USE
flag is only used in unstable branches, then
Hi,
I have a question about masked USE flags and packages in the
testing branch. I have a problem with "sci-biology/emboss", a
sequence analysis package I maintain that was keyworded ~amd64 a
few days ago. Six packages (containing various genetic and
biological data) in the tree have optional
Hi there.
The Haskell team has created a new eclass. It makes building Haskell
packages that conform to the Cabal [1] architecture (an effort that
aims at easing packaging and distribution of both Haskell libraries
and tools) nearly trivial. I wish to use the opportunity to thank
Lennart Kolmodin
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:46 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> If nobody on x86 is using a given package, is there a need to worry
> > about marking it ~x86/x86?
>
> When I said 'All', I didn't mean to include stuff that's not in x86.
> What I was trying to get at, was the idea that if the x86 arch te
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 00:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> a) Convenience.
Testing.
Some times we want to get user testing on a specific package or two, and
it is easier to distribute it via the normal portage tree than not.
Another reason for masking packages is for security reasons. This
espe
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:19:51PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Joe Wells wrote:
> > The best solution to this that I can think of is to extend OpenSSH
> > with the capability to copy terminfo information to ~/.terminfo on the
> > remote system.
>
> IMHO automated overwriting files in $HOME on ever
12 matches
Mail list logo
