Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-24 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > Just to make sure I am not missing something. > > > > Does this cover the > > > > - If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 046 ... > > - If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 050

[gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-24 Thread R Hill
Christian Parpart wrote: On Sunday 24 July 2005 20:29, Ivan Yosifov wrote: What's up with genlop ? There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ), the homepage http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html ( as listed in the ebuild ) is dead. If my understanding is correct, unmaintained

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-24 Thread Christian Parpart
On Sunday 24 July 2005 20:29, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > What's up with genlop ? > There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ), > the homepage http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html ( as listed in the > ebuild ) is dead. If my understanding is correct, unmaintained

[gentoo-dev] app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-24 Thread Ivan Yosifov
Hello Everyone, What's up with genlop ? There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ), the homepage http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html ( as listed in the ebuild ) is dead. If my understanding is correct, unmaintained packages are removed from the tree. Thanks, Ivan Yosifov.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: upgrade's and rc-scripts

2005-07-24 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 18:40 -0500, Brian D. Harring wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:20:19AM +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: > > Apropos config-files: what about config-files that are provided by the > > old-version of an ebuild but have been moved or removed by the new > > version? etc-update doesn't