On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:07 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> > I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If there
> > exists a -r15, do I then add a -r16 to make emerge realize an
> > update is available. What happens then
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 22:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> x11-base/xorg-x11 (no idea what it's trying to do with /etc/profile.d/xprint*)
Don't know, don't care, don't use xprint. Pull it from your USE flags
and all will be well. =)
I don't actively maintain xorg's xprint support; that's largely
Hi Kids,
I have a lowly 500MhzG4 with 768MB Ram running OS X 10.4.2 and
portage online in case anyone wants a shell for testing, breaking, or
seeing why the macos team does some of the wacky things that they
do...if you've never logged into a Darwin machine, don't be shy, the
box is ther
Lately I been the one handling all the vpopmail patches as soon as it
is feisible I will add it or you can submit a patch to be viewed and
possible added to the ebuild. Far as just joining the gentoo project
read the becoming a developer section
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/ha
Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
>I'm planning to edit the vpopmail ebuild Real Soon Now to add the
>mysteriously missing postgres USE flag and thus end up with a
>package compiled with the support we need.
>
>Instead of wasting my time re-adding this every time a new version
>of vpopmail comes along,
On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:26 pm, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> Do I simply mail a
> patch to this list, or ask somebody for a CVS account and commit
> changes directly?
Bugzilla: bugs.gentoo.org
> I'm also a bit confused about the portdir_overlay thing - If there
> exists a -r15, do I then add a -
On Sunday 17 July 2005 12:03 pm, Ned Ludd wrote:
> INSTALL_MASK is non cumulative.
> Please use INSTALL_MASK="${INSTALL_MASK} /usr/lib/charset.alias" as to not
> override the user in anyway.
any harm with making it cumulative ? iirc, it takes just a few minor tweaks
to portage to declare it as s
Craig Lawson wrote:
Comments?
This subject has also been brought up on the forum[1] very recently.
There have been some interesting ideas and alternatives posed that seem
workable. I was hoping some of the developers, if they have a moment,
could consider and critique these suggestions so w
Hi everyone,
I'm planning to edit the vpopmail ebuild Real Soon Now to add the
mysteriously missing postgres USE flag and thus end up with a
package compiled with the support we need.
Instead of wasting my time re-adding this every time a new version
of vpopmail comes along, I'd much rather us
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:47:14AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > I absolutely agree, but I am not associated with them in any way and
> > therefore am not in a possition to convince them to reconsider their
> > versioning policy (unfortunately).
> Why not just ask them? I've found that some p
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
Hey all,
It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
am applying the 2.18.1 -> 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced by some r
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
> chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
> bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
> am applying the 2.18.1 -> 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced
Hey all,
It's that time again...the time you get to get up from your
chairs/couches/bathtubs and grab a drink from the fridge because I am
bringing down bugs.g.o for about 30 minutes at 2000UTC, give or take. I
am applying the 2.18.1 -> 2.18.3 upgrade as evidenced by some recently
discovered and p
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 10:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 17 July 2005 09:34 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > this of course assumes that *no package* should ever install that file,
> > > including your bsd libc ...
> >
>
Stuart Longland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >>Filtering the lists leads to a slippery slope. What happens when
> >>you start getting false positives?
> >
> > True, but why not filtering binary attachments? *If* you have to
> > send an attachmen
On Sunday 17 July 2005 09:34 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this of course assumes that *no package* should ever install that file,
> > including your bsd libc ...
>
> Actually, libiconv should install that file, at least.
> We can RES
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
>>Filtering the lists leads to a slippery slope. What happens when you
>>start getting false positives?
>
>
> True, but why not filtering binary attachments? *If* you have to send an
> attachment to these lists, it should either be plain text or
On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this of course assumes that *no package* should ever install that file,
> including your bsd libc ...
Actually, libiconv should install that file, at least.
We can RESTRICT it for just a package?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer -
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:37:52AM +0100, Carlos Silva wrote:
>
> Sorry to only reply to this now, but i saw a mail of you talking about
> ndevfs. will that go into 2.6.13? not that i use devfs, 'cause i don't,
> i'm just curious.
No, ndevfs was written in a bout of temporary insanity. I will no
Herbert Fischer posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:13:19 -0300:
> All scripts created by Gentoo emerges have some header signature (sort of
> cvs information), am I right?
>
> If so, some sort of checking script can detect Gentoo signed files on
> /etc/profile.d
20 matches
Mail list logo
