Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step?
> acroread, gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger,
> mplayerplug-in?
As Aaron points out, mplayerplug-in, mozplugger, netscape-plugger,
netscape-flash and gplflash do not have the m
El lun, 11-07-2005 a las 20:57 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen escribió:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:10 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> > * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it
> > fails.
> > * i will go in vacations soon
> > * and i forget about 30 days sorry :P
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris White wrote:
>Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been
working on:
>
>http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
>
>Comments, etc are welcome.
>
>Chris White
one reminder:
"Code listing 1.3: MySQL configuration" pro
Chris White wrote:
> Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
>
> Comments, etc are welcome.
>
> Chris White
Nice guide! You might mention phpmyadmin as well, as it's a popular
web-based gui to mysql.
--
dju
On Monday 11 July 2005 21:38, Chris White wrote:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
>
> Comments, etc are welcome.
Sorry for posting twice, but
Code listing 4.11: REVOKE format
is incorrect. It probably should say
REVOKE [privleges] ON database.* FROM '[user]'@'[host]';
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 12:38:46PM EDT]
> Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow this step?
> acroread
makes sense here
> gplflash, netscape-flash, netscape-plugger, mozplugger,
> mplayerplug-in?
These are all plugins by definition, there's nothing to do
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:[Mon Jul 11 2005, 03:25:22PM EDT]
> profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape
> compatible browsers
>
> We already have this that is the same at the end.
This looks like the right thing to do instead of the browserplugin
On Monday 11 July 2005 21:38, Chris White wrote:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
>
> Comments, etc are welcome.
You might want to make
Code listing 4.19: Finding our guest user in the user table
a little narrower, as it makes the page much wider than my 1,280 pixel wide
scr
Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html
Comments, etc are welcome.
Chris White
pgpuXmAvblVwE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 11 July 2005 20:56, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> Thus it is probably better for the USE flag to be
> called `mozillaplugin', to allow for the future introduction of other
> browser-specific plugin USE flags.
profiles/use.local.desc:app-text/djvu:nsplugin - Builds plugins for Netscape
c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> a few :
>
> * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it
> fails.
But users will get angry if a package is not working and start filling bugs.
> * i will go in vacations soon
All the more reason _not_ to mark stable, since a
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:10 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> * this app will not broke anything in the system or userside if it
> fails.
> * i will go in vacations soon
> * and i forget about 30 days sorry :P
Those are not really valid points for breaking the policy - but it's too
late no
One issue I see with a `browserplugin' USE flag is that there may at
some point be web browsers in the tree that support plugins that are not
Mozilla-compatible. Although there are multiple Mozilla-compatible
browsers (mainly browsers which use Mozilla code or have Mozilla
embedded), the plugins i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't want to be an ignorant asss, but it is impossible for me to
> unsubscribe by myself right now.
>
> I currently only have webmail access, and the webmail program of my ISP
> will not
> accept an e-mail address in the form of "gentoo-dev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 18:38 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> I vote for global use flag and useage in all browserplugins.
Yes, I second that.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Am Montag 11 Juli 2005 15:13 schrieb Karl Trygve Kalleberg:
> Hi gang,
>
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Are you expecting the other browser-plugin-ebuilds to follow
Hi,
I don't want to be an ignorant asss, but it is impossible for me to
unsubscribe by myself right now.
I currently only have webmail access, and the webmail program of my ISP
will not
accept an e-mail address in the form of "gentoo-dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
for whatever reason, and since a re
KarlTK wrote: [Mon Jul 11 2005, 09:13:03AM EDT]
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing
> the 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag,
> called 'browserplugin'.
I think I can speak for the mozilla team... this change looks good.
Regards,
Aron
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make
install" is
a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good.
A solution can be to im
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:08 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Ok, to help devels know which are the requisites of Gentoo/FreeBSD porting
> (as
> we're going near to a release, I hope), I think it's better telling here what
> we hope you all will avoid (and we must replace when keywording
On Monday 11 July 2005 15:13, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Wasn't nsplugin plugin useflag already present?
[Btw I usually don't use it
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:13 +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
> 'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
> 'browserplugin'.
Yay!
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Meta
Hi gang,
over the course of the next few days, we will finally be replacing the
'mozilla' useflag in all the Java runtimes with a new USE flag, called
'browserplugin'.
The change means that in order to have continued Java browser plugin
support, you must add the useflag 'browserplugin' to the USE
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:02:52 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Anything using a standardish autotools install can potentially
| > explode when parallelised.
|
| That wasn't very informative...
Feel free to hire me
El lun, 11-07-2005 a las 14:58 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen escribió:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:53 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> > after a week w/o bugs for ebookmerge i will unmask it and i will remove
> > all the ebook-*.ebuilds if nobody say the secret word ;)
>
> A week? Any pa
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Anything using a standardish autotools install can potentially explode
> when parallelised.
That wasn't very informative...
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
signature.a
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:53 +0200, José Alberto Suárez López wrote:
> after a week w/o bugs for ebookmerge i will unmask it and i will remove
> all the ebook-*.ebuilds if nobody say the secret word ;)
A week? Any particular reason not to follow policy and wait 30 days?
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:32:06 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| > Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make
| > install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's
| >
Hola :)
after a week w/o bugs for ebookmerge i will unmask it and i will remove
all the ebook-*.ebuilds if nobody say the secret word ;)
regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Monday 11 July 2005 14:32, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Why not check which phase you're in instead?
That also can be done, true.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM)
pgpC1VHMPecuU.pgp
Description: PGP
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make install"
> is
> a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good.
> A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if "install" is in its
>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:20:20 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make
| install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not
| good. A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if "ins
Following the discussion me and Azarah had about make commands, I've started
thinking of a way to fix this without being too intrusive and I found a bit
of a solution following Az's suggestion to use a wrapper script.
Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make install" is
Ok, to help devels know which are the requisites of Gentoo/FreeBSD porting (as
we're going near to a release, I hope), I think it's better telling here what
we hope you all will avoid (and we must replace when keywording).
Those problems are also valid for ppc-macos AFAIK, so you won't help just
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 20:34 +0200, Richard Fish wrote:
> >>>I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes" as a
> >>>default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to
> >>>"no".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I've been running my boxes successfully with "no" since the opti
35 matches
Mail list logo
