M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi folks,
>>
>>I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
>>deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
>>
>>As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
>>quickly ran into scaling pr
thank you Harald
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 01:04 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > Anybody know what might loads the gnu iconv libs
> > (EUC-JP UHC EUC-KR JOHAB EUC-CN EUC-TW ISO-2022-KR ISO-2022-JP
> > ISO-2022-CN ISO-2022-CN-EXT EUC-JISX0213 EUC-JP-MS SHIFT_JISX0213
> > ISO-2022-J
Ned Ludd wrote:
> Anybody know what might loads the gnu iconv libs
> (EUC-JP UHC EUC-KR JOHAB EUC-CN EUC-TW ISO-2022-KR ISO-2022-JP
> ISO-2022-CN ISO-2022-CN-EXT EUC-JISX0213 EUC-JP-MS SHIFT_JISX0213
> ISO-2022-JP-3) from the /usr/lib/gconv directory?
>
> Perhaps some LC_foo=bar setting?
# str
Anybody know what might loads the gnu iconv libs
(EUC-JP UHC EUC-KR JOHAB EUC-CN EUC-TW ISO-2022-KR ISO-2022-JP
ISO-2022-CN ISO-2022-CN-EXT EUC-JISX0213 EUC-JP-MS SHIFT_JISX0213
ISO-2022-JP-3) from the /usr/lib/gconv directory?
Perhaps some LC_foo=bar setting?
--
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
I think most of the assumptions that you're making involve giving your
user population root access.
Don't
??
The assumptions I am making are clearly not involving giving a user
population root access. I just point to the lack of tools to maint
Duncan posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Sat, 18 Jun 2005 07:20:56 -0700:
> I have no reason to believe reiser4 will be added in the next couple
> releases, either, so 2.6.15 or later I'd guess, tho I have no exclusive
> info on it to cause me to think that.
Things change. LWN is r
Thierry Carrez wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop
>deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of).
>
>As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but
>quickly ran into scaling problems and the lack of tools to help.
>
>There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
>
>
>>I think most of the assumptions that you're making involve giving your
>>user population root access.
>>Don't
>
>
> ??
> The assumptions I am making are clearly not involving giving a user
> p
Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> I think most of the assumptions that you're making involve giving your
> user population root access.
> Don't
??
The assumptions I am making are clearly not involving giving a user
population root access. I just point to the lack of tools to maintain
semi-frozen trees
