Jason Huebel wrote:
> It's with pleasure that I announce a new developer: Dang. Dang has been
> working as an "Arch Tester" for AMD64 for a while now and has proven himself
> to be an asset to the team. So we felt it would be good to officially make
> him a developer. He'll be helping with amd64
It's with pleasure that I announce a new developer: Dang. Dang has been
working as an "Arch Tester" for AMD64 for a while now and has proven himself
to be an asset to the team. So we felt it would be good to officially make
him a developer. He'll be helping with amd64 bug squashing of course,
marduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:28 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only
> > there to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time
> > image. Would it be possible to just remove them from live files
On Sunday 22 May 2005 05:38, marduk wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:28 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there
> > to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would
> > it be possible to just remove them from l
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:28 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there
> to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would it be
> possible to just remove them from live filesystem after package files are
> merged to
Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there
to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would it be
possible to just remove them from live filesystem after package files are
merged to / ?
Or do .keep files serve another purpose, not obvious to me?
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Who else will attend "What the Hack"?
>
I also thought about it already, I guess I'll be there. =)
And, welcome to the team Killerfox. May the juice be with you.
--
Jan Brinkmann : Gentoo Developer (Amd64, Java, PPC, Sound, Vid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Martin wrote:
> I have a new developer to tell you about. He'll be joining the net-mail
> herd
and netmon too. mwuhaha :)
Welcome once again Ben.
- --
Anything is possible, unless it's not.
Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ BSD | cron | foren
Hi list,
I have a new developer to tell you about. He'll be joining the net-mail
herd and his name is Benjamin Smee. He's an Australian by birth, but he
is currently living in London and he has also lived in Berlin in the
past. He works as a Unix security technician and spends most of his free
tim
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 15:23 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> in any case it should be _pY as your snapshot is newer than the current
> version. _p stands for patch level, _pre for prerelease. In case of cvs
> ebuilds patch levels are more appropriate as the new version is often not
> known.
Thank
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 13:14 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> emerge pxes
Last time I checked this package, it didn't support XOrg X11 (only
XFree86-4.3) and neither did it support linux-2.6 (only linux-2.4) -
both showstoppers for me since the hardware, on which I wanted to deploy
the thin clients
On May 21, 2005, at 8:47 am, Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 05:06 +0100, Stroller wrote:
- as I understand it: wireless-tools to actually configure the SSID,
WEP key
wpa_supplicant can do this as well which makes wireless-tools optional
Ah, expletive! Please excuse my last email,
On May 21, 2005, at 6:25 am, Doug Goldstein wrote:
Stroller wrote:
Hi,
. far to long.
Yeah, sorry... I've always been pedantic. It's a real hard habit to
shift.
In summary and simple conclusion, yes you are wrong. So that makes 2
out
of the 4 or 5 active Mobile
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 05:06 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> - as I understand it: wireless-tools to actually configure the SSID,
> WEP key
wpa_supplicant can do this as well which makes wireless-tools optional
Roy
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
