-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| ... also known in its former lives as the "Bash Guide" and "The Doc".
|
| Ok, I think I've held off announcing this for long enough now. It's not
| complete, and there's a lot of stuff I'd like to rewrite, but I've been
| persua
On Sun, 01 May 2005 18:29:25 -0700 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/
|
| Before I read the whole thing, were you able to take anything from the
| existing handbook or need to rewrite everything from scratch?
Most of i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/
Before I read the whole thing, were you able to take anything from the
existing handbook or need to rewrite everything from scratch?
Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
... also known in its former lives as the "Bash Guide" and "The Doc".
Ok, I think I've held off announcing this for long enough now. It's not
complete, and there's a lot of stuff I'd like to rewrite, but I've been
persuaded to announce this anyway on the grounds that some people find
it useful and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
> Talking in terms of my collaboration with the Gentoo project, I've done
> just a very few things, within the Hardened Gentoo subproject, but I'm
> now interested in getting more involved and somewhat time becomi
On Sunday 01 May 2005 13:32, Lorenzo HernÃndez GarcÃa-Hierro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know really if people on the list use to do a little
> introduction to themselves, but I normally do it, thus, I can only pray
> for not giving it spam points ;)
Your name sounds familiar, do I know you from some
On Sunday 01 May 2005 06:17 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around?
each arch manager is responsible for their own profiles
all of the x86 ones have been pruned except for default-x86-2004.2 which we
will keep for a while since there isnt
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> > I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around
> > to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there.
> > I'll email upstream to see if whats the status on development fo
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 05:31 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Stuart Longland posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> excerpted below, on Sun, 01 May 2005 20:35:56 +1000:
>
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >> How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around? They
> >> make profile changes a mess for any
Hi,
I don't know really if people on the list use to do a little
introduction to themselves, but I normally do it, thus, I can only pray
for not giving it spam points ;)
As a brief introduction to myself, I'm Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro,
a young guy from Spain. I've been involved in kernel de
Stuart Longland posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Sun, 01 May 2005 20:35:56 +1000:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around? They
>> make profile changes a mess for anyone who wants to do something crazy
>> like change default US
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 03:17 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around?
There exists 48 deprecated profiles in the tree.
I've wondered about this myself about when is a good time to flush
Lance Albertson wrote:
> I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around
> to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there.
> I'll email upstream to see if whats the status on development for WOLK
> these days. The mailing lists have been quiet for the
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around? They
make profile changes a mess for anyone who wants to do something crazy
like change default USE flags for everyone. (Who would ever need to do
that?!?!)
I was just thinking this myself. Are there any use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How long are all those non-cascaded profiles going to stick around? They
make profile changes a mess for anyone who wants to do something crazy
like change default USE flags for everyone. (Who would ever need to do
that?!?!)
Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN
On Sunday 01 May 2005 04:43, R Hill wrote:
> Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having
> a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of
> something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if
> you remove test from FEATURES, touch .te
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
maillog: 30/04/2005-13:43:42(-0600): R Hill types
Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having
a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of
something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if
you remove test
17 matches
Mail list logo
