+1 non-binding. Good luck!
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 04:32, Uma gangumalla wrote:
>
> Dear Incubator Community,
>
> We have discussed Apache Ratis Podling graduation in the incubator general
> DISCUSS thread[1] and We did not see any objections to proc
Hi, there is a dedicated license header for ASF projects [1], while I saw you
are still using a common license header [2].
Also, I cannot verify the checksum via `shasum -a 512 -c
apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512`, error message is
`shasum: apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBAT
-1 (non-binding) because I cannot see a DISCLAIMER file in the release tar,
neither in the GitHub repository.
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:56, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02 release.
>
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data wa
Hey, most of the links in this email are invalid (404) [1], it seems because
you have moved the candidate into the release directory [2] already, which
should be done after incubator votes’ result (this thread).
Also, I found this tag [3] on GitHub but the commit hash doesn’t match the one
in t
You have to include a DISCLAIMER file in the release because Doris is still in
incubator.
If you have license issues, you can have DISCLAIMER-WIP so that IPMC members
won’t -1 when voting a release (WIP indicates that you’re resolving the
problem), but if you have resolved the license issues, y
I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it didn’t get
the approvals from IPMC but was released actually (in both dist.a.o and GitHub).
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for vote to
09 PM kishore g
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apologies for the mistake. We have done multiple releases until now
>>> and
>>>>>>> this is the first time we missed the step to get the approval from
>>>>> I
Sorry my -1, I saw there are binary files in the source tar, although they’re
test tools, but this is not allowed in the source release.
./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/plugin_test.jar
./fe/fe-core/src/test/resources/plugin_test/test_local_plugin/auditdemo.jar
> On Mar 26, 2021, at 1
Hi, my +1, I’ve checked
- Sha sum is OK
- GPG signature verified.
- RC matches the git tag / branch.
- LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP files exist.
- Docs, release names include “Incubating”.
However the following issue is not a blocker of the release and can be fixed in
the following releasees,
Hi, I’m +1, here are my check list
- LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
- Release candidate tar is signed correctly, by "yang...@apache.org”;
- Shasum of the tar is correct;
- “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
- License headers exist in files if necessary.
However, I
that’s the case, the license header in file
be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp is not complete,
please check and compare with other files, add the missing lines into it.
> I will fix the wrong path of
> "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit&
> On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:47, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi
> Doris 0.14.7 is a rolling version maintained internally by baidu. We will
> regularly select committs from the community to the internal version and
> release the version number. 0.14.7 has nothing to do with the community’s
> 0.14 release.
If
Hi
> I would like the first release of this package to be an official Apache
> release. I am therefore of the mindset that it should be treated as any other
> official Apache source code release.
Right, it should follow the Apache release policy and release source tar to be
an official Apache
In addition to Sheng’s list, I’ll also suggest the community to reconsider
the project name “ShenYu”, because from a quick search, there are several
potential branding / trademark conflicts, such as [1], [2], and [3].
Note that there is no official Chinese names for ASF Projects so you won’t
have
+1 binding
> On May 9, 2021, at 18:06, Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> According to the retirement guide[1] of incubator, we started the
> public discussion in the weex dev mailing list and got the
> conclusion[2] to go to the retirement process.
>
> Now we just start a LAZY consensus vote in
+1 (binding), some minor issues are expected to fixed in next release.
- Source tar is signed by aradzin...@datalingvo.com, it’s better to sign with
your @apache.org account.
- Sha shum is correct.
- LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER exist.
- License headers exist in files where applicable, except
+1 (binding)
- .asc, .sha512 are correct.
- no unexpected binary files in src.
- “incubating” in src name and doc.
- files have license header if needed.
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist.
- didn’t compile b/c OS not supported.
> On May 17, 2021, at 11:18, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and
Hi, my +1 binding only due to DISCLAIMER-WIP
- SIL Open Font License is included in source tar [1].
- Some files are not listed in LICENSE [2].
- Some files are not recognized as ASF license header nor listed in LICENSE,
hence I’m not sure what they are licensed [3].
[1] docs/python_docs/themes/
Hi, -1 (binding)
1. the commit ID claimed in this thread doesn’t match the release tag v2.4.0
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/dc841a2720ea0b5a6ca71f1b9c1aa7958d241f16).
> Release Commit ID:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/c75a273a8a9118411ed367e743b574e7fe
+1 (binding)
- .sha is correct.
- tar is signed by ura.kin...@gmail.com.
- “incubating” in tar name but not in doc.
- source files contain license header if needed.
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist.
The following are not blocker of the release but you might want to fix them in
the next release.
- it’
Carry my +1 from dev@
> On Aug 30, 2021, at 07:10, Serge Panev wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 7.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apa
+1 binding
- [OK] .sha512 is correct.
- [OK] .asc is signed by lorin...@apache.org.
- [OK] Source files have license header when needed.
- [OK] No unexpected binary files in source tar.
- [OK] LICENSE and NOTICE and DISCLAIMER exist.
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 20:52, Lorin Lee wrote:
>
> Hello IPMC,
Hi, +1 (binding), but please take a look at (3), (4).
1. sha sum is OK.
But prefer to use relative path instead of absolute path to generate the sha
sum, for the sake of convenience when verifying.
For example, prefer `sha -a 512 kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz` instead of
`sha -a 512
/Use
> I checked the mxnet project again,
> and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule
> ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers.
Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
-
dparty/ctc_include/contrib/moderngpu/include/mgpudevice.cuh#L2
>
>
> Xun Liu
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:56 PM kezhenxu94@apache
> wrote:
>
>>> I checked the mxnet project again,
>>> and I found that all the files in the
+1 binding to bring SeaTunnel into the incubator
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 21:56, Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring into the Incuba
Carry my +1 (binding) from dev@ list
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Dec 6, 2021, at 12:05, Serge Panev wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 8.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted an
itHub @kezhenxu94
Apache Incubator PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
all" or "user cases" to a submenu like "Powered
> by".
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://kafka.apache.org/powered-by
>
> --
>
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>
> Email:
> chenmin...@apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> A
+1, I saw we have had several discussion threads and they have had several
chances without positive outcome.
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 07:20, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress
> as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developin
+1 non-binding
ECharts is one of my favorite visualization projects :)
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Nov 23, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Ovilia wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> After discussion with the community [1], and a positive vote result [2] and
> the
> discussion under general m
31 matches
Mail list logo
