+1
Ate
> Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as
> it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
> Foundation.
>
> The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
> Foundation to remove the overhead of hav
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnso
On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
it looks like September report is almost done,
except the following podlings:
* Streams
[ ](streams) Matt Franklin
[ ](streams) Ate Douma
[ ](streams) Craig McClanahan
If there's any chance the above mentor
+1 (Airavata Mentor)
Ate
On 09/08/2012 03:23 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:11 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
+1 from me! (binding)
Great work guys! During the discussion I requested to be included on the PMC
and there was also talk of Ross being th
+1
Ate
On 10/24/2012 08:32 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Wookie podling from Apache Incubator.
Wookie entered the Incubator in July of 2009. During incubation, Wookie has:
* Produced 5 releases
* Added 3 new Committer/PPMC members
* Cleared IP on all
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also
o the affiliation section of the proposal as well.
Kind regards,
Ate
On 11/14/2012 01:41 PM, Davide Palmisano wrote:
Thanks Matthew,
but the page is an immutable one.
how can I do?
cheers,
Davide
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: D
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
Thanks, Ate
On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ...
Those proj
On 03/05/2013 01:47 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
After making source changes, then i just go to
https://cms.
+1 (binding)
Regards, Ate
On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
Open is open for at least 72h
On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
+1 @Marcel
Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or
not ?
He is asking for help (Champion) to create such a draft :)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
t the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
+1 (binding)
Ate
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well int
+1
Ate
On 30/11/10 07:52, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
The earlier discussion thread can
.
-
We are looking forward to your feedback and suggestions.
Kind regards,
Ate Douma
- COPY OF PROPOSAL FROM http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal -
= Apache Rave Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Rave is A new WEb And SOcial Mashup Engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box
On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the
o the incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care'
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
I'll close the vote at Tuesday morning 1st March CET to accommodate for the
coming weekend. That's a little over 5 days from now.
Regards,
Ate
- COPY OF PROPOSAL FROM http://wiki.apache.o
Here is my own vote: +1
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 25/02/11 01:08, Ate Douma wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so
I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal
The vote passes with a total of
+1
On 04/23/2011 01:57 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all ASF mates,
I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache OGNL.
Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
will be closed on April 26th (Tue) at 12:00 am CET.
Many thanks in advance to everyone will take pat
+1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
Ate
On 05/02/2011 11:32 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to call a vote to accept Airavata for entry into the Apache
Incubator. The proposal thread can be found at [1] and the proposal text is at
[2]
[ ] +1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
[ ] -1
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
cast a vote on it.
(we still need one +1 extra from IPMC on this to pass)
Kind regards,
Ate
On 09/05/2011 03:01 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being
versioned as 0.3-incubating.
We are requesting at least one IPMC member
o be better populated before this release can go out.
Please see my above comment: I think this release candidate *is* in compliance
(and pretty good at it imo) with the rules for the NOTICE/LICENSE files.
Thanks again for your feedback,
Ate
Upayavira
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:07 AM, &
+1
On 10/11/2011 11:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
As discussed, the PhoneGap project would like to enter the Incubator
under the Apache Callback name (potential alternative names to be
discussed during incubation). The initial proposal has been well
received and there are no major open issues
es into a portal server (e.g. Apache
Jetspeed-2) is very much on our short list.
So I'd like to help with mentoring Wookie through the incubator as much as
possible.
Note: while I'm an ASF Member, I'm not (yet) a Incubator PMC member, which I
understand is required for this.
+1
BTW: not sure if my vote is "binding" as I received no formal feedback yet
concerning my IPMC membership (but saw it being ACK by board).
Ate
Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache
Wookie, a W3C widget engine with Google Wave exte
Hi Noel,
I didn't receive one.
Ate
On 02/15/2010 05:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I have sent an e-mail directly to everyone who is officially on the
Incubator PMC. If you did NOT receive that e-mail, and believe that you
should be on the PMC, please notify me, via e-mail here.
Than
On 02/15/2010 05:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I didn't receive one.
Check your @apache.org e-mail. That is the address to which it went, and
you were definitely on the list.
Unless mail forwarding is broken, I should receive it on this email account.
Until now I go
nfiguration to streamline
and "automate" the Apache release process, going "elsewhere" is not really an option.
They will have to fix all these external (repository) dependencies, if even possible *just for the sake of Maven Central, or else indeed
&qu
e Maven I would think at least the ASF
community would have to be informed proper and be allowed to discuss what/how/when concerning such policy changes.
Never mind, we're cool again for now.
I'll ping you again when we are ready for the rsync of our "legacy" bugfix
release.
podling:
[ ] +1, terminate WSRP4J
[ ] -1, do not terminate WSRP4J
Here's my +1
Regards,
Ate
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/portals-general/201004.mbox/%3c4bbe524b.4090...@douma.nu%3e
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/portals-wsrp4j-user/201004.mbox/%3c4bbe524b
The vote for the termination of the WSRP4J podling passes with 9 binding +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Tally of the binding +1 votes:
Ate Douma
Ralph Goers
Carsten Ziegler
Bertrand Delacretaz
ant elder
Davanum Srinivas
Martijn Dashorts
Niclas Hedhman
Luciano Resende
I'm not all to fam
will be made read-only and the
wsrp4j mailing lists closed down shortly.
This email therefore very well might be the last one delivered to these lists.
With kind regards,
Ate Douma
On behalf of the Apache Portals PMC
-
To
On 04/20/2010 01:44 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the "standard" procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term "Retire" has bette
+1
Regards, Ate
On 10/11/10 16:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
I think we're ready to vote on the
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StanbolProposal now, copy included
below.
This is TPFKAF - The Project Formerly Known As FOO.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept Stanbol for incub
+1
Regards, Ate
On 23/11/10 21:16, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
We'd like to propose Wave for entry into the ASF incubator.
The draft proposal is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
A wave is a hosted,
+1
Ate
On 11/07/2011 10:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group of
developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following incubation. They
even went
file.
I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK all
those notices are required.
Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently?
Thanks, Ate
...ant
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
We still need to get one more IPM
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 01/12/2012 04:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
and missing mentors, by having the Champion act as the ma
On 01/17/2012 10:41 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file
in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i
expe
trates it is your
work. "Your work" is the operative issue; not when you happened to do that
work."
Original message and thread link: http://markmail.org/message/v3n7vyd4anxmgzbn
So I see no reason at all to worry about these now.
And, for the record, none of the NOTICE files
On 01/23/2012 10:56 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, "sebb" wrote:
On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.7-incub
ubator PMC. If there is one PMC Chair position
within the ASF which needs a *very* experienced person to fulfill it, this one
surely is.
Regards,
Ate
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
On 01/29/2012 03:15 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted t
On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
this
realize something not clear from this proposal: are we *only* talking
about the Incubator PMC Chair here, or is this a proposal for every PMC Chair?
I presumed (and propose) the latter, but maybe that wasn't the intend (yet).
Ate
Ross
-Ber
On 02/03/2012 06:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
+1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions.
+1 on that
Ate
Karl
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.]
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann
den?
There surely is a lot to improve, but rushing into half-backed and not properly
thought through radical changes doesn't make sense to me.
So, taking a step back, and have the proposers draft up a comprehensible story
first, and *please* not on this list but on the wiki, really
sues, but radically killing it off
IMO will also kill off more than just those issues: it will also kill the
Incubator community itself. Maybe ComDev can or actually then will have to take
over, but we should be really careful before breaking something down without
having a replacement 'sa
some 'bug' IMO.
I can't recall have heard it said like this before, instead confirmation of the
above rule quite often. Exceptions (no headers) only being allowed for sources
without real IP value.
Ate
IMHO if the headers are problematic for Wookie in
those files then it would
On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this
page), but the release
On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[legal-discuss@?]
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them?
Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream
users have the right to di
On 02/06/2012 07:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, "sebb" wrote:
...
Perhaps the answer to "Why is a licensing header necessary?"
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-heade
+1, good luck!
Ate
On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee:
ption AFAICS.
I agree.
I already voted for Jukka, under the impression only he now remained candidate.
Seeing that not being the case (or properly checked), I'm retracting my
preliminary vote for Jukka (for now).
Ate
-Bertrand
--
a majority from only those
who voted, etc.
With Noel not being voted on *at the same time*, there is no proper comparison
possible on the result (votes for Jukka) and 'undetermined result (support for
Noel).
Ate
Cheers,
Chris
Thanks many times Noel!
This also makes (for me) voting for Jukka again a proper process.
I'm therefore reconfirming my earlier retracted vote for Jukka, +1
Ate
On 02/10/2012 03:31 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said "it looks lik
eived 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev -
VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G
RESULT: http://s.apache.org/Fcv
IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
Ate Douma: +1
Ross Gardler: +1
Release notes:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.8-incubating/CHANGEL
vote on recommending the graduation of Rave
with the below resolution [2] to the ASF Board.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 to recommend graduation of Apache Rave as TLP
[ ] +0 don't care.
[ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, because ...
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Regards, Ate
+1 (binding)
On 02/27/2012 01:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
members, and shows a steady growth of community and
affiliation with the ASF and probably
should value project independence high as well.
If this really only concerns a thin layer to provide compatibility only for
Cloudera's API, hosting and maintenance of this should be the responsibility of
Cloudera itself.
Ate
Now the questio
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
determination, and is our Right.
Sorry but I don't th
On 02/29/2012 03:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
det
After 72+ hours this vote has passed with the following tally of 13 votes in
total, including +11 binding IPMC member votes:
+1:
Ross Gardler*
Chris Mattmann*
Arje Cahn
Hadrian Zbarcea*
Ate Douma*
Alex Karasulu*
Jukka Zitting*
Alan D. Cabrera*
Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
Niall Pemberton*
Henry
ing
--
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 04/10/2012 03:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
I haven't seen anyone respond to this yet and I'm in a tight spot myself to make
time for it.
I'll try to free up some by tomorrow though, please accept my apologies for the
delay.
Ate
On 04/22/2012 06:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Sorry to cross post here, but I t
leaning this up a bit further.
In addition, those samples modules also have additional NOTICE and LICENSE files
in their src/main/resources folders, but AFAIK these are not or no longer
used/bundled in the build artifact. Possibly outdated/leftover?
IMO none of the above really are release blocke
Dave should mail his incubator wiki id here and request being added to the wiki
ContributersGroup [1].
Once added to this page (by an incubator wiki admin) Dave can add/edit wiki
pages himself.
Ate
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup
On 06/19/2012 11:28 AM, Ross Gardler
+1 (binding, as well as a late Airavata PPMC Mentor vote)
Ate
On 06/18/2012 12:27 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the following
Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC
Hi Suresh,
I looked at the two issues raised and IMO these do not pose as blockers for this
release, so +1 from me on this release candidate (binding and Mentor)
More feedback below.
Regards, Ate
On 08/01/2012 03:46 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Hi All,
The VOTE is called for a lazy consensus
ent subscribers to the wsrp4j lists).
Without such a resolution on the legal status though, I'm afraid I can't nor want to invest valuable time in something which we then might
never be able to use...
Regards,
Ate
-
T
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Ate,
Thanks very much for your detailed reply. I'll comment on what's
specific to the incubating status.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...The problem of course is that WSRP4J still is in incubation and to
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Ate,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...Does that patent issue mean that an ASF release of the WSRP4J would
not be safe from a legal point of view?...
Or is it just that users might be afr
voting round also account/tally for the second
IMPC voting round on general@.
So in this case (taking into account that Till voted +1 twice, which technically
wasn't necessary) the finally tally of binding +1 votes actually was +5.
Ate
-Ian
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Mike Carey
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I
think it shouldn't be listed as such.
Ate (AsterixDB m
On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation
ver Justin (see below) seems to indicate that even this is not needed?
The reference to [2] as clarification however doesn't seems to be sufficient.
I'd like to know if there is more / clearer clarification available on this.
Or if there is not then this should be made explicit, required
Just for the record I'd like to add my binding +1 as well
Regards, Ate (AsterixDB mentor)
On 2016-04-11 06:10, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
the vote is now closed. The vote passes with the following votes:
+1 : 5 (all binding)
Chris Mattmann
Henry Saputra
Till Wes
David explained below.
Of course, externally hosted plugin binaries still remain external.
But verified Apache compliant plugins could be hosted at Apache itself.
As well as clearly marked in the plugin portal as such, further strengthening
the project and community binding at Apache.
Ate
[1] htt
On 2016-09-14 21:43, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate
any code from
re this is not clear or can be clearer, tell me and we will
change/add/whatever. FYI -- no one creating independent products based on
Apache NetBeans cares what its name is.
Only two things are in discussion right now: (1) licensing [which has been
discussed quite a bit with Apache folks like Bertr
On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
been addressed so far and would prevent us
FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first initiated a
[discuss] thread more than a week ago, which resulted in zero feedback.
Ate
(Streams mentor)
Forwarded Message
Subject: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:
On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote:
Ate,
Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Right.
Thanks for pointing this out John.
I've never before had to handle a podling retirement and overl
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote:
Ate,
Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Right.
Thanks for pointing this out John.
I've never before had t
7;d be happy to postpone/cancel
the retirement VOTE for now.
I suggest to head over to d...@streams.incubator.apache.org, let us know
what you can and will do for the project, and see how that works out.
Regards, Ate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Do
On 2016-09-21 18:28, apache wrote:
I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social web
data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a
lot, and I would like the keep the project operating at Apache, but as Ate
points out the community
W3C arrows this direction" already is a great way to start :-)
Kind regards, Ate
On 2016-09-23 17:45, Benjamin Young wrote:
I am currently sitting in the W3C’s Social Web Working Group’s face-to-face
meeting and have just finished discussing features of ActivityStreams 2.0:
https://www.w3.org/TR/
In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and
Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move
forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement.
I'm looking forward to the next steps!
Kind regards
#x27;
for this purpose. And AFAICT nobody questioned the list to be unfair or not
'good enough'. Of course adding one or two extra who were overlooked and are
expected to help make a difference and speed up the process still is fine.
So my strong advise is to stick to the original list.
And
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed
before I make this so?
Ate
On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Ma
On 2016-09-25 12:15, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases
contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list.
Hi GeertJan,
I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO
On 2016-09-25 17:20, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
and not all committers are required to commit :-)
That is interesting. Can you explain more about that?
What I meant to say is that at the ASF we also value and honour merit based on
things
e ASF will
benefit the project as well as the community.
Nor have I have seen one single argument to the contrary.
Regards, Ate
The costings here are more
than we usually get when a new podling is considered. This is a very good
start.
The data I refer to is only one data point. If you have
erning the process for assigning Suneel as mentor, can we assume lazy
consensus and just 'make it so' in a few days, if nobody objects?
Thanks, Ate
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can&#
incubator guide.
So where is or was this discussed, do you have some pointers?
Thanks, Ate
The nice thing about GIT is that it absolutely doesn't matter where I push the
commit to as long as the sha1 of the commit later pushed to the ASF repo is the
same.
Regarding 'pushing s
+1
Ate
On 2016-09-27 14:23, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 14:11, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to wait longer before starting a
vote?..
I'
include the text
of https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
If can send out the vote mail in about an hour or so if everyone is OK.
Ate
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
