This is interesting to me, not sure if I have the time to help much, but I
should be able to find some excuses to let my employers help fund (by
letting me use work time) work on this!
On 17 September 2013 11:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> I would like to propose the Batch
Why not try Celtic mythology I was thinking "Apache Nechtan" due to the
association with access to knowledge and floods... but heck I am not good
on my Irish mythology and the Norse ones always sounded way cooler
On 25 September 2013 13:23, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I also see thor is be
On 17 October 2013 06:46, Vinayak Borkar wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
>
> Thanks for your email. I was unaware that votes are allowed to take a long
> time. My understanding (albeit flawed, I guess) was that votes are allowed
> to be outstanding for only 72 hours. Hence my email.
>
My understanding is
well that type of "lazy majority" is really a "majority of binding votes
cast with a quorum" which differs from "majority of binding votes cast",
"majority of votes cast" and "quorum" (i.e. the needs 3x+1 to release...
because remember you cannot veto releases ;-) though only a fool of a
release ma
All,
It would be great if we could get a resolution on some of the JIRA's in
legal, e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-27
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-31
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-136
Legal-discuss,
As
On 10 October 2012 15:20, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Can you clarify? I understand that being able to speak to someone face to
> > face, and seeing their mannerisms and expressions, allows you to
> understand
> > them be
On 3 November 2012 17:22, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/11/3 Simone Tripodi :
> > Hi again Mohammed,
> >
> > one think I am curious about the Git management for Mayhem is how to
> > handle the fact that Mayhem is composed by components, like apache
> > commons, each component has his own lifecycle.
There is no requirement in Jenkins to extend AbstractProject if you don't
need a SCM. For example we have a number of proprietary plugins that extend
from different points in the Jenkins object tree, e.g. TopLevelItem, Job,
etc depending on how much code reuse is required.
I am not knocking your p
Bertrand suggested to send this question here.
I have a non-ASF hosted project (jszip.org hosted on github in case you are
interested), which I am hoping to build enough of a developer community
(currently it is just me) around to be able to bring it into the ASF.
To this end, I am licensing it u
On 21 April 2012 10:32, Mark Struberg wrote:
> PS: whoever does some builds with maven and has JavaScript in those
> projects should take a peek at jszip.org. It's really a nice project!
>
>
Thanks, great praise given that I only have the dynamic cross-reactor
classpath reloading working at this
Hi everyone,
So I have been working on my view of what JavaScript based web
application development should be like with Maven, to that end I have
created the JSZip set of projects. The first semi-ready piece of work
from that set of projects is the JSZip Maven Plugin.
This is very early code, but
Doeth:
http://jszip.org
On 1 June 2012 10:13, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So I have been working on my view of what JavaScript based web
> application development should be like with Maven, to that end I have
> created the JSZip set of projects. The first semi-read
On 1 June 2012 15:19, Christopher Hunt wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Not sure if you know, but the JS Import project (1) can already utilise zip
> files with a "www" classifier. The regular Assembly plugin can be used to
> make these packages. The following type of dependency declaration can then be
Yes, though jars don't work as well for packaging... let's drop the
other mailing lists (left on BCC to let them know they are being
dropped ;-) ) and move to just jszip-...@googlegroups.com
On 1 June 2012 15:24, LeClaire Garvin wrote:
> I think there is also some overlap with the web jar reposit
Hi everyone,
I just posted on my blog about an idea to get some more committers involved
in the Maven project:
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
If you are interested sign up.
Also please consider tweeting, google+ing, facebooking, etc so we can
On 17 August 2015 at 09:53, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 17.08.2015 10:45, schrieb Branko Čibej:
> [...]
>
>> So wait ... If the Subversion PMC releases source, and, say, Debian
>> creates a binary package called 'subversion-x.y.z' ... you're saying
>> that's trademark infringement and we should
On 18 August 2015 at 18:35, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Marvin's comprehensive response is very helpful.
>
> However, the first described case is about a third-party distribution of
> binaries, even though some or all of the third parties are participants on
> the project. (I assume the executab
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 02:47 Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes that was my analysis of the question: If I decide to produce an
> > unofficial binary release of Maven
arks. Also the version number is different if patches have been applied.
Would that be an acceptable defence of our mark?
On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 09:46, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 02:47 Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug
he Microsoft website. The installer's first
screen says clearly that this is "microsoft's build of Apache maven" and
our marks are ack on the first screen.
Is that ok?
On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 10:03, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps, the m
make our software available easily in different
packaging systems. The pmc may want to take ownership of popular packaging
systems, so we'd need to be able to trump others
On Wed 19 Aug 2015 at 10:27, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I might add also that o
do you need further clarifications?
On 25 August 2015 at 11:52, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > But I am still awaiting guidance from brand on whether a technical name
> > usage - e.g. installer package name - is a use of
I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h
lazy consensus voting (with an assumed +1 absence any votes cast) that most
CTR projects operate under... and thus it can also be very easy to miss the
fact that there are reviews going on (and I am being generous here, I
sus
On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h
> > lazy consensus voting (with an assumed +1 absence any votes cast) that
> most
> > CT
On 18 November 2015 at 14:24, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 18/11/15 14:34, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> >>> I believe the issue her
;s not always possible so occasional reverts are
> likely, but you shouldn't be seeing lots of reverts.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Stephen Connolly<mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 11/18/2015 7:21 AM
>
Spoilsport ;-)
On 25 November 2015 at 16:47, Upayavira wrote:
> Not replying to this mail specifically, but to the thread in general...
>
> People keep using the terms RTC and CTR as if we all mean the same
> thing. Please don't. If you must use these terms, please define what you
> mean by them
On Wednesday 25 November 2015, Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
> > On 22 Nov 2015, at 22:34, Branko Čibej >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The major question here, for me, is: if the project is RTC, then why
> > would I make an effort to become a committer if at the end of the day
> > I'm still not trusted to know
On Wednesday 25 November 2015, Steve Loughran
wrote:
>
> > On 22 Nov 2015, at 22:34, Branko Čibej >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The major question here, for me, is: if the project is RTC, then why
> > would I make an effort to become a committer if at the end of the day
> > I'm still not trusted to know
+1 (enthusiasting)
On Tuesday 27 September 2016, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended,
> please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/
+1 from me as maven PMC member and as one of the contributors to the code
base (all 7 commits worth iirc ;-) )
On Wednesday 28 September 2016, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Apache Maven received a code donation for Aether, that we renamed to Maven
> Artifact Resolver to fix a trademark issue:
>
> http:
On Friday 30 September 2016, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> 28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein >:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach <
> jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> >> One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven
> >> repository
> >> more
If there have been over 200 contributors to the project, I would expect to
see an effort to pull some of them in shortly after entering incubation...
Assuming they can demonstrate merrit.
An initial committer list of 5 for such a big project with a large and
diverse history of contributions would
On 13 March 2015 at 10:50, Russel Winder wrote:
> I have been reading this thread via GMane with some worry. I have now
> joined the email list and this post is fortuitous in that it allows me
> to make some of the points I wish to contribute.
>
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 08:55 +0100, Bertrand Delac
We @ Maven will have a full dump of the Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
up to test migration...
On 13 March 2015 at 17:36, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> Yes the biggest problem is going to be the migration of JIRA. Codehaus only
> wants to provide a CSV export which is far from being enough for us
(Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability to
bend his ear. As a result I got him to agree to do two full exports from
JIRA, one to let us test the process and a second when we are ready to
migrate)
On 13 March 2015 at 21:37, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> We @ Ma
On Saturday, March 14, 2015, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:13, Jochen Theodorou > wrote:
> >
> > Am 13.03.2015 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
> >> (Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability
> to
> >>
, Upayavira wrote:
> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the
> Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
> up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues are
> *included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to worry about
> here?
>
>
On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira:
>
>> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the
>> Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
>> up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues a
10:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> >
> > > Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira:
> > >
> > >> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a
preparing
and doing such an import. Our own timelines for Maven's switch may not
align with the Groovy incubation timelines... (mind you we are all at the
grace of Ben for getting our timeline for the second export he committed to
the Maven project)
On 16 March 2015 at 09:49, Stephen Connolly
On 16 March 2015 at 09:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 09:53, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> > Arg! hit send too soon.
> >
> > You should really check in with Hervé to confirm that Groovy was in the
> > export. I am 99% confident that your issues and comments are i
+1 (non-binding)
On 19 March 2015 at 06:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/in
43 matches
Mail list logo
