+1
On 10/06/2011 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I
would like to
initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.
At the end
Folks,
At present, I believe that the OSOA SCA specifications do not contain
any actual conformance statements that would allow anyone to judge
whether an implementation is compliant or not. As a result, this
restriction is somewhat moot.
As a result, I don't consider this restriction of gr
Folks,
Comments inline...
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 10/12/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Establish the Apache Tuscany project:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
Having both the last two sentences start "This software will..." doesn't
sound perfect to me so if we are able to move the "for distribution at no
charge..." bit up to the top that seems better, which gives:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
"...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
to the public, t
Oisin,
The updated license files are published on the OSOA site:
http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0/license.txt
and
http://www.osoa.org/sdo/2.1/schemas/license.txt
Yours, Mike.
Oisin Hurley wrote:
On 20 Dec 2007, at 20:50, Janet Campbell wrote:
We have been in touch with the OSOA folk
Folks,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
no performance rights so i guess that we'll have to strike out the
sing-a-long-a-spec from the next apachecon ;-)
Done to protect the innocent ;-)
Yours, Mike.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
One of the steps for TLP migration is to add Tuscany to
http://www.apache.org. We need to have a title (hover text) for Tuscany.
What should we have?
What about "A Distributed Composite Application Framework Implementing
SCA"?
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond,
I think tha
Folks,
Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache Tuscany and the SCA
specifications?
Yours, Mike.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usen wrote:
From my understanding, Tuscany could leverage Etch to offer a wire
format that can be consumed by a variety of different languages and
environments, not a contestant to it.
Ciao
Henning
Mike Edwards schrieb:
Folks,
Can I ask if anyone has compared Etch with Apache T
Scott,
I don't think that my question was answered.
I want to make it clear: I have no issues with names.
Yours, Mike.
scott comer wrote:
the discussion about names seems somewhat done. it is easy to get the
impression from the volume that there is a demand for name change. in
my opinion th
Dion,
You're right. It should mention Incubator.
I apologise for this oversight and I'll get it fixed.
Yours, Mike.
PS I didn't write it! ;-)
Dion Gillard wrote:
Are documents like
https://www14.software.ibm.com/iwm/web/cc/earlyprograms/websphere/soawas61/
supposed to mention that a proje
Ant
+1
Mike.
ant elder wrote:
On 6/7/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My apologies if I'm resurrecting something that was discussed
extensively.
It has been pointed out to me that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57
The actual votes are held on the private l
13 matches
Mail list logo
