I also have the wave report ready to go, but I don't seem to be able to
edit the wiki page.
Can I please be added. My username is: MichaelMacFadden
On 11/1/12 9:54 AM, "Marvin" wrote:
>* Your project name
>* A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the
>project
> or
Benson,
Yes, Angus had been working this issue for us and found a few third party
Jars. Here is an extract from his email:
--
There's a couple of things going on at once at the moment:
-i'm in contact with the libIDN author, who is happy to release the
software under the Apache license,
imple script to do that.
~Michael
On 12/3/12 3:45 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Michael MacFadden
> wrote:
>> Benson,
>>
>> Yes, Angus had been working this issue for us and found a few third
>>part
Joe,
Thanks for your comments. Can you clarify for us the PPMC comment. I think we
are a bit confused between the concepts of a top level project PMC, the
incubator IPMC, the PPMC you have mentioned, and piddling mentors. I don't
think we had ever discussed nominating a PPMC assuming that first
The lightwave project I was referring to is over at google code:
http://code.google.com/p/lightwave/
~Michael
On Nov 24, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2010, at 4:29 , Michael MacFadden wrote:
>
>> I agree, there are other wave implementations popping
+1 (non-binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
able (except as stated in this License)
>>> patent license for patents necessarily infringed by implementation of
>> this
>>> specification. If you institute patent litigation against any entity
>>> (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit
2010, at 6:08 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
> Michael MacFadden has written some ideas here:
>
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/apache-incubator-roadmap
>
> FYI, several of us on the Google Wave team are away on vacations in
> parts of the December-January time period, so a
process, or should we just work with
you (the mentors), to determine our path? Thanks for your help.
Sincere Regards,
Michael MacFadden
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html.
>
> -Tad
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Michael MacFadden <
> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wave Mentors,
>>
>> What are the logistics of boostrapping the Wave Podling? I assum
Should those of us on the contributor list, just go ahead and get these
submitted sooner rather than later?
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Tad Glines wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On 12/04/2010 09:22 AM, Tad Glines wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Also, committers will not
Ralph,
If I understand correctly, an individual could submit an ICLA first and then
later submit the CCLA if the employer or situation requires it. Meaning that
previously submitting an ICLA would not be in conflict with a subsequent CCLA.
If that is the case I would recommend all of the init
All,
Obviously getting the accounts created for the wave committers could take a
little extra time given the holidays. Just wondering if we have heard any
conformation that the process has started, or on the other hand if we have
missed something procedurally? Thanks.
Michael
On Dec 23, 201
There are additional benefits to dependency management systems like Maven or
Ivy as well. Beyond avoiding checking in jar files, you can reference a
dependency once and not have to proliferate references if you have multi module
builds (with multiple build files). Also, if your project gets se
David,
Thanks for the heads up. I have been trying to follow said process, however it
seems like the wave committers have not yet been given that ability to commit
changes to the incubator SVN. I have some pending changes to the wave project
page I have been waiting to check in.
~Michael
On
59.12852.1418516...@webmail.messagingengine.com), SVN auth grants
> are setup for all Wave committers. Not sure if the permissions are extended
> to the Incubator site?
>
> Andrus
>
> On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>>
something else going on.
>
> Can you confirm what URL you are using, and what error you get?
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:54 -0800, "Michael MacFadden"
> wrote:
>> We have access to the wave SVN, but it seems like we don't h
e going on.
>
> Can you confirm what URL you are using, and what error you get?
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:54 -0800, "Michael MacFadden"
> wrote:
>> We have access to the wave SVN, but it seems like we don't have access to
>> the i
That did it... was able to check in. Thanks David!
~Michael
On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:56 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
>> Sorry, I should have looked at this. I'll need to dig more, because you
>> *are* in the incubator group - I saw it when checking your CLAs were
>> present. So ther
Joe,
As a newbie on the CMS, I would say I don't have any large concerns Wave has
migrated over without to much trouble. I think the system works pretty well.
I like the CMS Bookmarklet, and I really like the staging build and the whole
process in general.
I would like to see the UI for the
I agree, there are other wave implementations popping up, some of which include
"wave" in the name and some don't. "Lightwave" for example is one such
project. I think that Apache Wave and the Wave in a Box product should be fine.
Also, as Dan points out "Google Wave" product is going to cease
Ralph,
Your due diligence is appropriate and appreciated. Thanks.
~Michael
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks. That answers my only concern. I think this would be a great addition.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Soren Lassen wrote:
>
>> I wo
22 matches
Mail list logo
