It would be nice if everybody would started wearing their Apache hats and act
as individuals that are interested in joining an exciting new project in the
incubator. I would prefer it if everybody would assume good intentions here.
We're all collaborating out in the open as a community, so let's
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin specification. The donation is tracked by CELIX-29 [1].
The IP clearance document is placed under:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/celix-shared-memory-rsa.
Hello Dave,
Thanks for spotting that one. My mistake, I completely overlooked that field. I
will correct it and, after also resolving the issue Craig brought up, start a
new vote.
Greetings, Marcel
On 18 Dec 2013, at 17:24 , Dave Brondsema wrote:
> On 12/18/13 3:47 AM, Marcel Offerm
mistakes.
Greetings, Marcel
On 18 Dec 2013, at 17:08 , Craig L Russell wrote:
> Is there a software grant for this donation? I didn't see any reference from
> any of the below links (nor in CELIX-81 either).
>
> Craig
>
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:47 AM, Marcel Offermans wr
Given the issues raised by Craig and Dave, I am cancelling this vote. I will
fix the mistakes and start a new vote.
Greetings, Marcel
On 18 Dec 2013, at 9:47 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
> remote service
Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
remote service admin specification. The donation is tracked by CELIX-81 [1].
The (updated) IP clearance document is placed under:
https://svn.apache.org/re
o need to re-run the vote if the document is corrected.
>
> On Dec 18, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
>> Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
>>
>> Apache Celix received the donation of a shared memory implementation of the
>
Formally closing this vote now. There were no -1 votes, so the vote is a
success and the IP can now be imported by the project.
On 18 Dec 2013, at 23:28 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Note that this is a new vote, after cancelling the previous one.
>
> Apache Celix received the dona
We have had many great talks about podlings in the past, so I see no reason why
not. I would definitely encourage them to get the word out!
Greetings, Marcel
On 25 Jan 2014, at 17:36 pm, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on podlings could
> subm
I agree with sebb and David that it's a good idea to remove links to SVN from
the download page and I propose that the Celix community changes this on their
website.
At the same time I think this should be a separate discussion, as this thread
is about voting about the Celix release itself. Ale
Hello Chip,
On 23 Apr 2014, at 16:28 , Chip Childers wrote:
> This is the discussion thread for this proposal. We would also like to
> solicit contributions from additional IPMC members willing to mentor the
> potential podling. Anyone interested?
Yes, I am interested in signing up as a mento
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 from me on that as well (as one of the other mentors of the project). As I
said already when this was discussed within the Celix community, I think that,
although small, the community is slowly growing, they have demonstrated that
they know how to do releases, discuss things on the mailing li
On 13 Jun 2014, at 17:32 pm, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Celix Project:
* Alexander Broekhuis
Hello Bertrand,
On 16 Jun 2014, at 8:57 am, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> Here's current Board member Bertrand Delacretaz in 2012:
> ...
>> People come and go, so to be realistic I'd say you need at least five
>> active PMC members
+1
I've been mentoring the project since it entered the incubator and I truly feel
they have demonstrated they know "the Apache way".
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addi
Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-user-admin-2.html
Thanks!
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> wrote:
>> 14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь "Mohammad Nour El-Din"
>> написал:
>>> One minor note:
>>> - In [1] I noticed files related to Eclipse like .classpath and
>>> .project, I am not
Just to wrap it up, the 72 hour window has more than passed, so I'm calling
this IP clearance complete.
Thank you.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Marcel Offermans
wrote:
> Please review the following contribution for IP clearance:
>
> http://incubator.staging
On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
>
> I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
>
> Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn't seem
> to help. But since this is only the case when di
On Nov 4, 2012, at 23:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> At the bottom of the template for each podling's report, I'd like to have a
> space for each of the mentors, every month, to reaffirm his or her
> involvement in the podling. Thus, instead of (at most) one mentor signing
> off on the report,
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
> wrote:
>> I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
>> have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
>> formats, I personally don'
On Dec 13, 2012, at 22:39 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/12/13 Benson Margulies :
>> Reading your report, I don't see any barrier to graduation. This could
>> be good, insofar as you all could discuss this, and move toward
>> graduation. Or it could be less good, if you have barriers that you
>> d
On Dec 19, 2012, at 14:15 , Fabian Christ wrote:
> 2012/12/19 Christian Grobmeier
>
>> Disclaimer and License is available in the source tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/parent-1-incubating/
>>
>> I do not see a chance to put these files to Nexus. Or do you have an
Hello Roman,
Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple of
weeks. After Luciano stepped down as a mentor some time ago, we are still one
mentor short. Would you consider becoming one, so we have three again?
Greetings, Marcel
-
Well, I don't think it's fine. As long as our release policy states that all
releases must be archived on /dist we should do exactly that. Or change the
policy.
Greetings, Marcel
On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:53 , Benson Margulies wrote:
> The Maven PMC pushes no plugin releases nor parent poms to /
On Dec 21, 2012, at 13:52 , Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> Give me a URL where this policy is and I'll edit it.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> While I a
-1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and LICENSE
files, but they must be located at the root of the archive [1], and not in a
subfolder like they are now.
A question about the contents of the NOTICE file, can you explain why you
included the line:
"Copyright 2010-2
Hello Christian,
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> -1 Because: The release now is a ZIP file, and contains the NOTICE and
>> LICENSE files, but they must be lo
Hello Simone,
In general I'm always sceptical when people point at old releases and say "this
must be okay because X did it like this as well". However, in this case I agree
that there are many packagers that put in an extra folder in their source
archive and put those files there.
So:
+1 for
On Dec 27, 2012, at 21:09 , Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> Hello Roman,
>>
>> Thanks for helping out with reviewing the Celix release over the last couple
>> of weeks.
>> After Luciano stepped do
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I would never search for a generic job scheduling application in the Wicket
project. I still don't know exactly what this new project is about, but the
fact that it happens to use Wicket in itself is not enough to make it a Wicket
subproject if you ask me.
Greetings, Marcel
On Jun 5, 2013, at
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 30 Nov 2010, at 7:52 , Dan Peterson wrote:
> Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 12 Dec 2010, at 15:50 , Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> As per a the discussion and expressed interest in
> general@incubator.apache.org, please create the
> android-inter...@incubator.apache.org mailing list.
>
> Make me an initial moderator, but I'll request others to volunteer.
Please add me as a
Hello Antoine,
For me it's non-controversial. I'd love to see something like this, but I'm
probably not going to be able to spend a lot of time contributing to it. Maybe
some OSGi specific parts, especially if we can somehow integrate them with Bnd
and BndTools.
Greetings, Marcel
On Jan 17,
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 Accept Airavata into the incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I removed it from the monthly section.
On 19 May 2011, at 3:46 , David Crossley wrote:
> Alex, same answer as for March 2011 report:
>
> Celix is listed in the Monthly section of ReportingSchedule.
> Clutch gathers that data.
>
> If your project feels that it has finished their monthly
> report
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Andrey,
On 30 Jul 2011, at 10:07 , Andrey Kuznetsov wrote:
> I am author of Imagero, JGUI, UIO and some other nice libraries.
> I want to transfer my work to Apache.
> However I don't have time and fortitude to do it by myself.
> So I search for someone who could do it for (or with) me.
If
rce now.
>
> I really don't have much time to go through incubator process etc.
> So again, I hope find here someone who could help me.
>
> Andrey
>
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marcel Offermans [mailto:marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl]
&g
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:12 , ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bertrand
Delacretaz wrote:
I agree with Bill that it's a good thing for the Incubator to clarify
best practices, and teach podlings to follow them even if older
projects sometimes don't. We tend to do the same for
On Sep 1, 2009, at 17:45 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
ACE is another podling related to OSGi and AFAIK it implements the
DeploymentAdmin OSGi spec.
Just to clear up any misconceptions:
ACE does not implement the DeploymentAdmin spec. That was donated to
Felix and ACE uses it.
ACE is an applic
On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
It is a goal of the Aries project to provide a natural home for open
source implementations of current and future OSGi EEG specifications,
including the opportunity for the collaborative development of
compliance tests, and an environment to demons
Hello Kevan,
On Sep 4, 2009, at 6:48 , Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Was a contact with Felix made prior to dropping the proposal here?
I got the
impression that wasn't the case, which I find surprising... If I am
wrong,
what was the meat of such?
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at
22:20 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Relationships with Other Apache Projects
I know ACE is only in incubation, but is there a reason for not
mentioning it in this list? To me
ation programming model.
Regards, Graham.
2009/9/6 Davanum Srinivas :
Marcel,
I believe it was an oversight to have missed mentioning ACE.
Hopefully one
of the proposed committers will comment on this aspect.
thanks,
dims
On 09/06/2009 08:29 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
It probably got swamped i
ication
programming model).
2. To distribute and configure enterprise OSGi application
components implemented to the enterprise OSGi application programming
model.
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/6 Marcel Offermans :
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at
22:20 ,
Marcel Of
+1 (non-binding)
Looking forward to using such a unified API from within ACE.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.
+1 (non binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1. Accept LCF into the Incubator.
(non binding)
Sounds like a very useful project.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.ap
Hello Les,
On May 23, 2010, at 19:21 , Les Hazlewood wrote:
> To that end, I created such a guide that I hope will help people in the
> future:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/confluence-auto-export.html
>
> Please feel free to comment and make suggestions. Hopefully this is
> one less
On 27 Jul 2010, at 12:11 , Ross Gardler wrote:
> Are there any problems bringing these modules into the podling, managing them
> under the same community but each having separate release cycles.
Apache Felix is one example of a project that consists of many modules, each
with their own release
Hello Richard,
On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:21 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I think this is interesting. However, I'd like to point out that you may need
> to take care in how you position this. I believe the OSGi specs allow for
> compliant open source implementations, but it is unlikely this implement
On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:28 , Marcel Offermans wrote:
> On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:21 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> I think this is interesting. However, I'd like to point out that you may
>> need to take care in how you position this. I believe the OSGi specs allow
>&
On 5 Oct 2010, at 8:58 , David Bosschaert wrote:
> Small correction: Universal OSGi is an RFP, not a whitepaper. In fact,
> it's RFP 89.
> I'm currently working to see if I can distribute this RFP to a wider audience.
You are right and that would be nice!
Greetings, Marcel
Over the last couple of days, we have seen some good suggestions and support
for the initial proposal. For implementing the Remote Services, some candidates
have been identified (Axis2/C and SCA bindings in Tuscany).
Before starting a vote we need a couple of mentors to support the project while
On 6 Oct 2010, at 9:52 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> ...As the champion, I'd be happy to be a mentor too. This would be my first
>> time, so I probably
>> need to formally join the Incubator PMC first?
On 18 Oct 2010, at 21:12 , Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Please evaluate the status of your project with respect to graduation. Why,
> for example, are Thrift and JSPWiki not yet ready to fly? What about Ace?
ACE is still working towards a release. We want to demonstrate we can do that
first.
Gree
reating and deploying bundles to a named target.
* Confluence Wiki
To be able to provide help, documentation, faq etc, a wiki is needed.
= Initial Committers =
Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
= Sponsors =
== Champion ==
Marcel Offermans
== Nominated Mentors ==
* Marcel Offermans
*
The vote for Celix to enter the incubator is now closed and has been ACCEPTED.
The results:
+6 (binding): Davanum Srinivas, Karl Pauls, Luciano Resende, Felix Meschberger,
Bertrand Delacretaz, Alan D. Cabrera
+1 (non-binding): Richard S. Hall
Thanks to everybody who joined in on the discussion
I was present at those discussions, and I very much like the idea. One other
project that already works on Android is Apache ACE (deploying software
components to an Android based application that uses Apache Felix plus the ACE
management agent).
Learning about more project that work on Android
+1
On 9 Nov 2010, at 0:36 , Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
> accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
> proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/inc
On 19 Nov 2010, at 10:48 , Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation
> at the Apache Incubator.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache
On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:10 , Ross Gardler wrote:
> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can be
> found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied below.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
---
On 22 Nov 2010, at 12:51 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting Aries to an Apache
> TLP and graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hours.
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscri
On 24 Nov 2010, at 4:29 , Michael MacFadden wrote:
> I agree, there are other wave implementations popping up, some of which
> include "wave" in the name and some don't. "Lightwave" for example is one
> such project. I think that Apache Wave and the Wave in a Box product should
> be fine.
Li
On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FedizProposal
Definitely an interesting proposal! Just a comment on the affiliations section:
isn't it true that both Olivier Lamy and Colm O'hEigeartaigh are also working
for Talend? Of course part of t
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organizations and did a release in May this year to
demonstrate we follow the A
Hello Ant,
On Nov 17, 2011, at 16:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
On Nov 21, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 21 November 2011 08:42, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some time back we moved to having 3 mentors, which had the positive of more
>>> hands and enough binding votes, bu
On Nov 21, 2011, at 18:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 11:11 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Speaking wearing a hat:
>>
>> There is no requirement for monolithic releases. The project can
>> choose whatever units it likes to release, so long as each one of them
>> is fully buildab
roekhuis, David
Bosschaert, Benson Margulies (*), Chris A Mattmann (*), Alex Karasulu (*),
Julien Vermillard (*), Alan D. Cabrera (*), Guillaume Nodet (*), Hadrian
Zbarcea (*), Jean-Baptiste Onofré (*), Marcel Offermans (***)
There were no other votes.
* = IPMC
** = PPMC
*** IPMC + PPMC
The vote is succ
As a heads up to the IPMC we wanted to announce that we just started a release
vote[1] on the ace-dev mailing list about ACE 0.8.1-incubator. This release
basically fixes a few issues that came up while running our community
graduation vote [2]. As soon as the vote has been closed, we will call
(http://www.apache.org/).
>>>> Licensed under the Apache License 2.0.
>>>> <<<
>>>>
>>>> should be just
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> This product includes software developed at
>>>> The Apache Software
appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache ACE Project:
* Angelo van der Sijpt
* Brian Topping
* Clement Escoffier
* Carsten Ziegeler
* Jean-Baptiste Onofre
* Karl Pauls
der Sijpt
* Brian Topping
* Clement Escoffier
* Carsten Ziegeler
* Jean-Baptiste Onofre
* Karl Pauls
* Marcel Offermans
* Toni Menzel
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER R
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
>> project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
>>
>> " a Project Management Committee charged with the c
On Dec 18, 2011, at 18:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>>> I think the Board might h
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hello Alex,
On Dec 19, 2011, at 21:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Here's a link to the proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
First of all, thanks for this proposal, it looks well thought out. I have a
question
After 72 hours have gone by, this vote has passed with 11 binding IPMC +1 votes
and no other votes:
+1: Bertrand Delacretaz, Mark Struberg, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Senaka Fernando,
Chris A Mattmann, Olivier Lamy, Niclas Hedhman, Karl Pauls, Marcel Offermans,
Tim Williams, Daniel Kulp
I will
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Whilst I agree there is value in demonstrating a starting podling what a good
report should look like by doing it for them, I also strongly believe in
learning by doing, so I would still propose that a podling has a go at it
themselves, before having a mentor step in. In the end, this is also a
y and distributing trust to the mentors who are providing it.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Marcel Offermans
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: antel...@apache.org; Joe Schaefer
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:03 PM
>>
On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> UNSIGNED JANUARY REPORTS:
>
> Celix
Celix is late reporting this month because of holidays. A report is being
worked on, written by the PPMC and actively monitored by me. You can expect it
later today.
Greetings, Marcel
On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> -1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
> a year old and lacking crisp plan for graduatuation:
>
> Celix
A plan is being discussed on the list, but did not make it into this month's
report. I would kindly like to as
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> -1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
>>> a year old and
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 6:02 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> -1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over
>>> a year old and lac
+1
Makes perfect sense to me!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair.
>> If this VOTE isn't successful, then he'll remain the chair. If
>> you want to explicitly cal
+1
And thanks a lot Noel!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> ...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I
>> understand his point correctly, *no* binary dependencies are
>> acceptable within a source tar ball.
Let's s
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
